System of systems analysis of catastrophic events: A preliminary investigation of unprecedented scenarios

L. Levine, Carol Woody
{"title":"System of systems analysis of catastrophic events: A preliminary investigation of unprecedented scenarios","authors":"L. Levine, Carol Woody","doi":"10.1109/THS.2010.5654962","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"When catastrophes occur, what key dynamics take place? How do these dynamics affect our technical infrastructure, and how can we understand these patterns of failure in order to better build and operate future technologies and systems of systems? What happens when catastrophes are unprecedented and the known range of emergency response activities is ineffective? This research analyzes multiple catastrophes, viewed through designated lenses, with consideration of how systems of systems fail, as well as the implications for future systems of systems. In this phase we studied two cases, Hurricane Katrina and 9/11, representing threats from natural forces and terrorism. The lens used is the Generic Error Modeling System (GEMS). The GEMS framework helps us to understand types of errors that occur in operational situations and distinguishes among skill-, rule-, and knowledge-based modes. We report on key findings in three areas: (1) the problematic role that technology plays given its fragility and dominance, (2) a coordination and centralization effect, and (3) the failure to consider failure.","PeriodicalId":106557,"journal":{"name":"2010 IEEE International Conference on Technologies for Homeland Security (HST)","volume":"78 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2010 IEEE International Conference on Technologies for Homeland Security (HST)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/THS.2010.5654962","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

When catastrophes occur, what key dynamics take place? How do these dynamics affect our technical infrastructure, and how can we understand these patterns of failure in order to better build and operate future technologies and systems of systems? What happens when catastrophes are unprecedented and the known range of emergency response activities is ineffective? This research analyzes multiple catastrophes, viewed through designated lenses, with consideration of how systems of systems fail, as well as the implications for future systems of systems. In this phase we studied two cases, Hurricane Katrina and 9/11, representing threats from natural forces and terrorism. The lens used is the Generic Error Modeling System (GEMS). The GEMS framework helps us to understand types of errors that occur in operational situations and distinguishes among skill-, rule-, and knowledge-based modes. We report on key findings in three areas: (1) the problematic role that technology plays given its fragility and dominance, (2) a coordination and centralization effect, and (3) the failure to consider failure.
灾难性事件的系统分析系统:对前所未有的情景的初步调查
当灾难发生时,发生了什么关键的动态?这些动态如何影响我们的技术基础设施,我们如何理解这些故障模式,以便更好地构建和操作未来的技术和系统的系统?当灾难是前所未有的,而已知的应急活动范围是无效的,会发生什么?本研究通过指定的镜头分析了多重灾难,考虑了系统的系统是如何失败的,以及对未来系统的系统的影响。在这个阶段,我们研究了两个案例,卡特里娜飓风和9/11,代表了自然力量和恐怖主义的威胁。使用的镜头是通用误差建模系统(GEMS)。GEMS框架帮助我们理解在操作情况下发生的错误类型,并区分基于技能、规则和基于知识的模式。我们报告了三个方面的主要发现:(1)技术在脆弱性和主导地位下所扮演的有问题的角色,(2)协调和集中效应,以及(3)未能考虑失败。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信