Mixed use and diversity as a New Urbanism principle guiding the renewal of post-industrial districts

M. Cysek-Pawlak
{"title":"Mixed use and diversity as a New Urbanism principle guiding the renewal of post-industrial districts","authors":"M. Cysek-Pawlak","doi":"10.2478/udi-2018-0017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The revival of post-industrial areas, understood as a factor determining contemporary urban development, is a key process in regeneration. Such areas attract strategic renewal projects, because despite their perfect location next to city centres, they have long been inaccessible to city residents. The backbone of the projects is provided by programmes laying out the future functions of such areas and their target users. In the past, mono-functional districts were popular but their numerous weaknesses have meant that mixed use and diversity are increasingly being introduced into urban areas today. Mixed use and diversity underlie the urban design movement known as the New Urbanism. This article assesses the role of mixed-use and diversity as the New Urbanism principle guiding the renewal of post-industrial areas. It is based on desk research and a comparative analysis of two case studies: the Paris Rive Gauche (France) and the New Centre of Lodz (Poland). The article concludes that regeneration based on the New Urbanism principle of functional and user diversity leads to an effective renewal of run-down urban areas. The applicability of other New Urbanism principles stressing the need to ensure harmony between an urban design strategy and the human scale in the revival of urban neighbourhoods is also worth considering in the long term.","PeriodicalId":115598,"journal":{"name":"Urban Development Issues","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urban Development Issues","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/udi-2018-0017","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Abstract The revival of post-industrial areas, understood as a factor determining contemporary urban development, is a key process in regeneration. Such areas attract strategic renewal projects, because despite their perfect location next to city centres, they have long been inaccessible to city residents. The backbone of the projects is provided by programmes laying out the future functions of such areas and their target users. In the past, mono-functional districts were popular but their numerous weaknesses have meant that mixed use and diversity are increasingly being introduced into urban areas today. Mixed use and diversity underlie the urban design movement known as the New Urbanism. This article assesses the role of mixed-use and diversity as the New Urbanism principle guiding the renewal of post-industrial areas. It is based on desk research and a comparative analysis of two case studies: the Paris Rive Gauche (France) and the New Centre of Lodz (Poland). The article concludes that regeneration based on the New Urbanism principle of functional and user diversity leads to an effective renewal of run-down urban areas. The applicability of other New Urbanism principles stressing the need to ensure harmony between an urban design strategy and the human scale in the revival of urban neighbourhoods is also worth considering in the long term.
混合使用和多样性作为指导后工业地区更新的新城市主义原则
后工业地区的复兴是一个关键的再生过程,是决定当代城市发展的一个因素。这些地区吸引了战略更新项目,因为尽管它们毗邻城市中心,但长期以来,城市居民无法进入这些地区。这些项目的支柱是规划这些地区及其目标用户的未来功能的方案。在过去,单一功能区很受欢迎,但它们的许多弱点意味着今天的城市地区越来越多地引入了混合用途和多样性。混合用途和多样性是被称为新城市主义的城市设计运动的基础。本文评估了混合用途和多样性作为指导后工业地区更新的新城市主义原则的作用。它是基于桌面研究和两个案例研究的比较分析:巴黎左岸(法国)和罗兹新中心(波兰)。基于新城市主义的功能和用户多样性原则的更新是对城市破旧区域的有效更新。其他新城市主义原则的适用性也值得长期考虑,这些原则强调在城市社区的复兴中需要确保城市设计策略与人文尺度之间的和谐。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信