Potentialities of Participatory Pedagogy in the Women’s Studies Classroom

Julianne Guillard
{"title":"Potentialities of Participatory Pedagogy in the Women’s Studies Classroom","authors":"Julianne Guillard","doi":"10.5406/FEMTEACHER.23.1.0050","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In my classroom, at the end of the semester there are a lot of hugs among peers, fist bumps, and cell phone numbers exchanged. The start of the semester, on the other hand, presents a very different scene, with a lot of cold stares, nervous toe-tapping, and eyes averted to more interesting media on cell phones. How did we, both instructor and students, manage to get to Point B (the former happy scene) from Point A (the latter beginning stages)? Much of the relaxed atmosphere of “Point B” owes itself to a loosely structured approach to student participation in my Introduction to Gender, Sexuality, and Women’s Studies course. In this essay, I will describe this approach toward participation (which helps create a welcoming, “safe space” environment) along with feedback, both positive and negative, from previous students. Within the first week of class during each semester, I ask my students to define their means and methods of their participation, how they are “allowed” or not allowed to participate in the class, as Daria mentioned in the opening quotation to this essay. Creating participation norms enables us to jointly develop explicit expectations of how we wish to interact with, and be treated by, each other in the classroom. Based on Don Blake’s “Norming Exercise” and Jim Cummins’s Negotiating Identities framework, this exercise destabilizes and refocuses power dynamics (student-teacher; student-student; safe spaces/unsafe spaces) and privileges (the speaker and the listener; agreement and disagreement). Sample questions from these frameworks that students use to construct their participation norms include, “What will we need to make our classroom discussions more effective?”, “How will we handle conflict?”, and “How will we build a positive climate where everyone feels listened to?” Through feminist pedagogical (Maher and Tetreault) analysis of classroom behavior and student interviews, I will argue for a wide range of disciplines to employ this form of participatory pedagogy in their classrooms. This essay will detail why norming classroom participation is a necessary tool for a progressive learning environment; how individual classes have created different means of communication and the benefits and detractions of each method; how norm-","PeriodicalId":287450,"journal":{"name":"Feminist Teacher","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Feminist Teacher","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5406/FEMTEACHER.23.1.0050","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

In my classroom, at the end of the semester there are a lot of hugs among peers, fist bumps, and cell phone numbers exchanged. The start of the semester, on the other hand, presents a very different scene, with a lot of cold stares, nervous toe-tapping, and eyes averted to more interesting media on cell phones. How did we, both instructor and students, manage to get to Point B (the former happy scene) from Point A (the latter beginning stages)? Much of the relaxed atmosphere of “Point B” owes itself to a loosely structured approach to student participation in my Introduction to Gender, Sexuality, and Women’s Studies course. In this essay, I will describe this approach toward participation (which helps create a welcoming, “safe space” environment) along with feedback, both positive and negative, from previous students. Within the first week of class during each semester, I ask my students to define their means and methods of their participation, how they are “allowed” or not allowed to participate in the class, as Daria mentioned in the opening quotation to this essay. Creating participation norms enables us to jointly develop explicit expectations of how we wish to interact with, and be treated by, each other in the classroom. Based on Don Blake’s “Norming Exercise” and Jim Cummins’s Negotiating Identities framework, this exercise destabilizes and refocuses power dynamics (student-teacher; student-student; safe spaces/unsafe spaces) and privileges (the speaker and the listener; agreement and disagreement). Sample questions from these frameworks that students use to construct their participation norms include, “What will we need to make our classroom discussions more effective?”, “How will we handle conflict?”, and “How will we build a positive climate where everyone feels listened to?” Through feminist pedagogical (Maher and Tetreault) analysis of classroom behavior and student interviews, I will argue for a wide range of disciplines to employ this form of participatory pedagogy in their classrooms. This essay will detail why norming classroom participation is a necessary tool for a progressive learning environment; how individual classes have created different means of communication and the benefits and detractions of each method; how norm-
参与式教学法在妇女研究课堂中的潜力
在我的教室里,学期结束的时候,同学们会互相拥抱,互碰拳头,交换手机号码。另一方面,新学期的开始呈现出截然不同的景象,许多人冷眼看着,紧张地敲着脚趾,目光转移到手机上更有趣的媒体上。作为老师和学生,我们是如何从A点(后一个开始阶段)到达B点(前一个快乐的场景)的?“B点”的轻松氛围很大程度上要归功于我的《性别、性与女性研究导论》课程中对学生参与的松散结构。在这篇文章中,我将描述这种参与的方法(它有助于创造一个受欢迎的“安全空间”环境)以及来自以前学生的积极和消极的反馈。在每学期上课的第一周内,我要求我的学生定义他们参与的手段和方法,他们如何“被允许”或不被允许参与课堂,正如达利亚在这篇文章的引言中提到的那样。创建参与规范使我们能够共同制定明确的期望,即我们希望如何在课堂上与他人互动,以及如何被他人对待。基于唐·布莱克的“规范练习”和吉姆·康明斯的“协商身份”框架,这种练习破坏了权力动力学的稳定性,并重新聚焦了权力动力学(学生-教师;student-student;安全空间/不安全空间)和特权(说话者和听者;同意和不同意)。学生用来构建参与规范的范例问题包括:“我们需要什么来使课堂讨论更有效?”、“我们如何处理冲突?”以及“我们如何建立一个积极的氛围,让每个人都觉得自己被倾听了?”通过女权主义教学法(Maher和Tetreault)对课堂行为和学生访谈的分析,我将论证广泛的学科在课堂上采用这种形式的参与式教学法。本文将详细说明为什么规范课堂参与是进步学习环境的必要工具;个别班级如何创造不同的交流方式,以及每种方式的好处和坏处;如何规范- - - - - -
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信