Evaluation of temporomandibular disorder symptoms and oral health-related quality of life in adolescent orthodontic patients with different dental malocclusions

CRANIO® Pub Date : 2019-11-25 DOI:10.1080/08869634.2019.1694756

A. Karaman, S. Buyuk

{"title":"Evaluation of temporomandibular disorder symptoms and oral health-related quality of life in adolescent orthodontic patients with different dental malocclusions","authors":"A. Karaman, S. Buyuk","doi":"10.1080/08869634.2019.1694756","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Objective: To estimate the prevalence of temporomandibular disorders in adolescent orthodontic patients with different dental malocclusions and to assess the relationship between oral health-related quality of life. Methods: This study was carried out on 648 randomly selected individuals 14–19 years of age. Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (DC/TMD), Fonseca Questionnaire, and Oral Health Impact Profile-14 (OHIP-14) forms were used. Results: The GCPS, TMD Pain, Fonseca, OHIP-14, PHQ-9, GAD-7, OBC, and PHQ-15 mean scores of female participants were statistically significantly higher than males (p < 0.05).There was a significant difference among the malocclusion groups in terms of their mean scores in GCPS, Fonseca, and OHIP-14 (p < 0.05).The age values and JFLS, TMD Pain, Fonseca, OHIP-14, PHQ-9, GAD-7, and PHQ-15 were statistically significant correlations in the positive direction. Conclusion: The DC/TMD form allows both a physical assessment of Axis I and II that examines psychosocial status and pain-related disorders and a more comprehensive assessment. The mean OHIP-14 and Fonseca questionnaire scores of Class III groups were found to be significantly higher.","PeriodicalId":162405,"journal":{"name":"CRANIO®","volume":"98 5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"13","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CRANIO®","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08869634.2019.1694756","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 13

Abstract

ABSTRACT Objective: To estimate the prevalence of temporomandibular disorders in adolescent orthodontic patients with different dental malocclusions and to assess the relationship between oral health-related quality of life. Methods: This study was carried out on 648 randomly selected individuals 14–19 years of age. Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (DC/TMD), Fonseca Questionnaire, and Oral Health Impact Profile-14 (OHIP-14) forms were used. Results: The GCPS, TMD Pain, Fonseca, OHIP-14, PHQ-9, GAD-7, OBC, and PHQ-15 mean scores of female participants were statistically significantly higher than males (p < 0.05).There was a significant difference among the malocclusion groups in terms of their mean scores in GCPS, Fonseca, and OHIP-14 (p < 0.05).The age values and JFLS, TMD Pain, Fonseca, OHIP-14, PHQ-9, GAD-7, and PHQ-15 were statistically significant correlations in the positive direction. Conclusion: The DC/TMD form allows both a physical assessment of Axis I and II that examines psychosocial status and pain-related disorders and a more comprehensive assessment. The mean OHIP-14 and Fonseca questionnaire scores of Class III groups were found to be significantly higher.

查看原文本刊更多论文

不同牙合错青少年正畸患者颞下颌紊乱症状及口腔健康相关生活质量评价

摘要目的:了解不同牙合错的青少年正畸患者颞下颌紊乱的患病率，并评估其与口腔健康相关生活质量的关系。方法:随机抽取14 ~ 19岁的648人进行研究。使用了颞下颌疾病诊断标准(DC/TMD)、Fonseca问卷和口腔健康影响概况-14 (OHIP-14)表格。结果:女性受试者GCPS、TMD Pain、Fonseca、OHIP-14、PHQ-9、GAD-7、OBC、PHQ-15平均得分高于男性，差异有统计学意义(p < 0.05)。错颌合组间GCPS、Fonseca、OHIP-14平均评分差异有统计学意义(p < 0.05)。年龄值与JFLS、TMD Pain、Fonseca、o髋关节-14、PHQ-9、GAD-7、PHQ-15呈显著正相关。结论:DC/TMD表格允许对轴I和轴II进行身体评估，检查社会心理状态和疼痛相关疾病，并进行更全面的评估。第三类组OHIP-14和Fonseca问卷得分均显著高于其他组。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

CRANIO®

自引率

0.00%

发文量