Thy Governance Matters: A Study on Governance Practices of Stock Exchanges in India

A. Majumder
{"title":"Thy Governance Matters: A Study on Governance Practices of Stock Exchanges in India","authors":"A. Majumder","doi":"10.31098/ijmesh.v4i1.525","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Historically the responsibility of ushering the practices of good governance, transparent management and effective control process for the corporate houses rests under the jurisdiction of those stock exchanges where the shares of the companies are listed. However, the very question of the management and governance of these stock exchange houses are always under the scanner across the globe in view of the limitations of their historic pattern of member-owned ‘non-profit’ kind of mutual organizational structure. The lacunae of that typical organizational structure was that their activities are primarily targeted towards members interests as well as that set up was not immune fully from the malice like insider trading and conflict of interest for office bearers and traders. In view of this following the global pattern the Union Government of India had decided for corporatization of stock exchanges thereby creating a separation of ownership, management and trading membership of stock exchanges which is formally known as demutualization and corporatization of stock exchanges. A committee was set up by the SEBI under the chairmanship of Justice M.H. Kania which had submitted the report in 2002 recommending corporatizations and demutualization of stock exchanges which become mandatory for every stock exchange in India to implement within a stipulated period of time. Against this backdrop the present study is conducted to make an overview of the present state of governance affairs of major stock exchanges in India. It has been observed that the corporatization and governance practices of the major bourses in India had followed governance practices like separation of the post of chairman and CEO, inclusion of public interest directors as outside directors in the board, adherence to code of conducts for directors, organizing frequent meetings of directors etc.","PeriodicalId":403893,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Management, Entrepreneurship, Social Science and Humanities","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Management, Entrepreneurship, Social Science and Humanities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31098/ijmesh.v4i1.525","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Historically the responsibility of ushering the practices of good governance, transparent management and effective control process for the corporate houses rests under the jurisdiction of those stock exchanges where the shares of the companies are listed. However, the very question of the management and governance of these stock exchange houses are always under the scanner across the globe in view of the limitations of their historic pattern of member-owned ‘non-profit’ kind of mutual organizational structure. The lacunae of that typical organizational structure was that their activities are primarily targeted towards members interests as well as that set up was not immune fully from the malice like insider trading and conflict of interest for office bearers and traders. In view of this following the global pattern the Union Government of India had decided for corporatization of stock exchanges thereby creating a separation of ownership, management and trading membership of stock exchanges which is formally known as demutualization and corporatization of stock exchanges. A committee was set up by the SEBI under the chairmanship of Justice M.H. Kania which had submitted the report in 2002 recommending corporatizations and demutualization of stock exchanges which become mandatory for every stock exchange in India to implement within a stipulated period of time. Against this backdrop the present study is conducted to make an overview of the present state of governance affairs of major stock exchanges in India. It has been observed that the corporatization and governance practices of the major bourses in India had followed governance practices like separation of the post of chairman and CEO, inclusion of public interest directors as outside directors in the board, adherence to code of conducts for directors, organizing frequent meetings of directors etc.
治理至关重要:印度证券交易所治理实践研究
从历史上看,为公司公司引入良好治理、透明管理和有效控制程序的责任,属于公司股票上市的证券交易所的管辖范围。然而,这些证券交易所的管理和治理问题一直在全球范围内受到关注,因为它们的历史模式是会员制的“非营利性”共同组织结构的局限性。这种典型组织结构的不足之处在于其活动主要以成员利益为目标,并且其设置不能完全免受内幕交易和公职人员和交易员利益冲突等恶意行为的影响。鉴于这一全球模式,印度联邦政府决定将证券交易所公司化,从而使证券交易所的所有权、管理和交易会员分离,正式称为证券交易所的股份化和公司化。印度证券交易委员会在M.H. Kania法官的主持下成立了一个委员会,该委员会于2002年提交了一份报告,建议证券交易所公司化和股份化,这对印度的每个证券交易所来说都是强制性的,必须在规定的时间内实施。在此背景下,本研究的目的是对印度主要证券交易所的治理事务现状进行概述。据观察,印度主要交易所的公司化和治理实践遵循了治理实践,如董事长和首席执行官的职位分离,将公共利益董事作为外部董事纳入董事会,遵守董事行为准则,组织频繁的董事会议等。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信