Tech Starts: High-Technology Business Formation and Job Creation in the United States

Ian F. Hathaway
{"title":"Tech Starts: High-Technology Business Formation and Job Creation in the United States","authors":"Ian F. Hathaway","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2310617","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"New and young businesses — as opposed to small businesses generally — play an outsized role in net job creation in the United States. But not all new businesses are the same — the substantial majority of nascent entrepreneurs do not intend to grow their businesses significantly or innovate, and many more never do. Differentiating growth-oriented “start-ups” from the rest of young businesses is an important distinction that has been underrepresented in research on business dynamics and in small business policy.To advance the conversation, we contrast business and job creation dynamics in the entire U.S. private sector with the innovative high-tech sector — defined here as the group of industries with very high shares of employees in the STEM fields of science, technology, engineering, and math. We highlight these differences at the national level, as well as detailing regions throughout the country where high-tech start-ups are being formed each year. The major findings include:• The high-tech sector and the information and communications technology (ICT) segment of high-tech are important contributors to entrepreneurship in the U.S. economy. During the last three decades, the high-tech sector was 23 percent more likely and ICT 48 percent more likely than the private sector as a whole to witness a new business formation.• High-tech firm births were 69 percent higher in 2011 compared with 1980; they were 210 percent higher for ICT and 9 percent lower for the private sector as a whole during the same period. This is important because the productivity growth and job creation unleashed by these new and young firms — aged less than five years — require a continual flow of births each year.• Of new and young firms, high-tech companies play an outsized role in job creation. High tech businesses start lean but grow rapidly in the early years, and their job creation is so robust that it offsets job losses from early-stage business failures. This is a key distinction from young firms across the entire private sector, where net job losses resulting from the high rate of early-stage failures are substantial.• Young firms exhibit an “up-or-out” dynamic, where they tend to either fail or grow rapidly in the early years. The job-creating strength of surviving young firms, while strong for young businesses across the private sector as a whole, is especially distinct for high-tech start-ups: the net job creation rate of these surviving young firms is twice as robust. • High-tech and ICT firm formations are becoming increasingly geographically dispersed. As technological advancement allows for the production of high-tech goods and services in a wider set of areas, many regions are catching up. The opposite has been true for the private sector as a whole, where new business growth has been occurring most in regions with already higher rates of new business formation.","PeriodicalId":329354,"journal":{"name":"ERPN: Other Microeconomic Theory (Sub-Topic)","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"59","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERPN: Other Microeconomic Theory (Sub-Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2310617","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 59

Abstract

New and young businesses — as opposed to small businesses generally — play an outsized role in net job creation in the United States. But not all new businesses are the same — the substantial majority of nascent entrepreneurs do not intend to grow their businesses significantly or innovate, and many more never do. Differentiating growth-oriented “start-ups” from the rest of young businesses is an important distinction that has been underrepresented in research on business dynamics and in small business policy.To advance the conversation, we contrast business and job creation dynamics in the entire U.S. private sector with the innovative high-tech sector — defined here as the group of industries with very high shares of employees in the STEM fields of science, technology, engineering, and math. We highlight these differences at the national level, as well as detailing regions throughout the country where high-tech start-ups are being formed each year. The major findings include:• The high-tech sector and the information and communications technology (ICT) segment of high-tech are important contributors to entrepreneurship in the U.S. economy. During the last three decades, the high-tech sector was 23 percent more likely and ICT 48 percent more likely than the private sector as a whole to witness a new business formation.• High-tech firm births were 69 percent higher in 2011 compared with 1980; they were 210 percent higher for ICT and 9 percent lower for the private sector as a whole during the same period. This is important because the productivity growth and job creation unleashed by these new and young firms — aged less than five years — require a continual flow of births each year.• Of new and young firms, high-tech companies play an outsized role in job creation. High tech businesses start lean but grow rapidly in the early years, and their job creation is so robust that it offsets job losses from early-stage business failures. This is a key distinction from young firms across the entire private sector, where net job losses resulting from the high rate of early-stage failures are substantial.• Young firms exhibit an “up-or-out” dynamic, where they tend to either fail or grow rapidly in the early years. The job-creating strength of surviving young firms, while strong for young businesses across the private sector as a whole, is especially distinct for high-tech start-ups: the net job creation rate of these surviving young firms is twice as robust. • High-tech and ICT firm formations are becoming increasingly geographically dispersed. As technological advancement allows for the production of high-tech goods and services in a wider set of areas, many regions are catching up. The opposite has been true for the private sector as a whole, where new business growth has been occurring most in regions with already higher rates of new business formation.
科技创业:美国高科技企业的形成和就业机会的创造
新的和年轻的企业——与一般的小企业相反——在美国的净就业创造中发挥着巨大的作用。但并不是所有的新企业都是一样的——绝大多数新生企业家并不打算大幅发展自己的业务或进行创新,更多的人从未这样做过。区分以增长为导向的“初创企业”与其他年轻企业是一个重要的区别,但在商业动态和小企业政策的研究中,这一点一直没有得到充分体现。为了推进对话,我们将整个美国私营部门的商业和就业创造动态与创新高科技部门进行了对比。在这里,高科技部门的定义是在科学、技术、工程和数学等STEM领域拥有大量员工的行业。我们强调了国家层面的这些差异,并详细介绍了全国各地每年成立高科技初创企业的地区。主要发现包括:•高科技部门和高科技的信息和通信技术(ICT)部分是美国经济中创业精神的重要贡献者。在过去的三十年中,高科技部门比整个私营部门更有可能见证新业务的形成,其可能性高出23%,信息通信技术高出48%。•2011年高科技公司的诞生比1980年高出69%;在同一时期,信息通信技术(ICT)的收入增长了210%,而整个私营部门的收入则下降了9%。这一点很重要,因为这些成立不到5年的新公司所释放的生产率增长和就业创造,需要每年持续不断的新生儿流动。•在新兴和年轻的公司中,高科技公司在创造就业方面发挥着巨大的作用。高科技企业开始时很少,但在最初几年增长迅速,它们创造的就业机会非常强劲,足以抵消早期企业失败造成的就业损失。这是与整个私营部门的新公司的一个关键区别,在私营部门,由于早期失败率高,净失业人数很大。•年轻的公司表现出“要么向上,要么出局”的动态,它们往往在最初几年要么失败,要么迅速成长。幸存下来的年轻公司创造就业的能力,虽然对整个私营部门的年轻企业来说都很强大,但对高科技初创企业来说尤其明显:这些幸存下来的年轻公司的净就业创造率是前者的两倍。•高科技和信息通信技术公司的形成在地理上越来越分散。随着技术的进步,高科技产品和服务可以在更广泛的领域生产,许多地区正在迎头赶上。整个私营部门的情况正好相反,新业务增长大多发生在新业务形成率已经较高的地区。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信