Seizure of digital data and “selective suppression” of digital evidence

N. Kuntze, C. Rudolph, Hellen Schilling, Aaron Alva, Brooke R. Brisbois, B. Endicott-Popovsky
{"title":"Seizure of digital data and “selective suppression” of digital evidence","authors":"N. Kuntze, C. Rudolph, Hellen Schilling, Aaron Alva, Brooke R. Brisbois, B. Endicott-Popovsky","doi":"10.1109/SADFE.2013.6911545","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The search and gathering of potential digital evidence often includes taking images of hard-drives and other storage media. Instead of actually taking the physical hard-drive, only the data contained on the drive is mirrored, stored and then used for investigations. This article discusses the legal context in Germany and in the U.S. and compares the actual legal situation with the current practice based on the available software products for forensic evaluations. In spite of large differences between both countries, the investigation shows that in both cases current technology needs to be improved or even is in contradiction with basic laws. The proposed solution can provide a suitable implementation without changing the actual process of evaluating the digital evidence. For investigations in Germany, the new process proposes a selective partial deletion of images, thus removing all inadmissible data. For the U.S. the process proposes a selective suppression of data so that it can be recovered if a case is appealed.","PeriodicalId":287131,"journal":{"name":"2013 8th International Workshop on Systematic Approaches to Digital Forensics Engineering (SADFE)","volume":"76 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2013 8th International Workshop on Systematic Approaches to Digital Forensics Engineering (SADFE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SADFE.2013.6911545","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The search and gathering of potential digital evidence often includes taking images of hard-drives and other storage media. Instead of actually taking the physical hard-drive, only the data contained on the drive is mirrored, stored and then used for investigations. This article discusses the legal context in Germany and in the U.S. and compares the actual legal situation with the current practice based on the available software products for forensic evaluations. In spite of large differences between both countries, the investigation shows that in both cases current technology needs to be improved or even is in contradiction with basic laws. The proposed solution can provide a suitable implementation without changing the actual process of evaluating the digital evidence. For investigations in Germany, the new process proposes a selective partial deletion of images, thus removing all inadmissible data. For the U.S. the process proposes a selective suppression of data so that it can be recovered if a case is appealed.
扣押数字数据和“选择性压制”数字证据
搜索和收集潜在的数字证据通常包括拍摄硬盘驱动器和其他存储媒体的图像。而不是实际使用物理硬盘驱动器,只有包含在驱动器上的数据被镜像、存储,然后用于调查。本文讨论了德国和美国的法律背景,并在现有的司法鉴定软件产品的基础上,将实际的法律情况与目前的做法进行了比较。尽管两国之间存在很大差异,但调查表明,在这两种情况下,当前的技术需要改进,甚至与基本法律相矛盾。提出的解决方案可以在不改变评估数字证据的实际过程的情况下提供合适的实现。对于德国的调查,新程序建议选择性地部分删除图像,从而删除所有不可接受的数据。对美国来说,该程序建议选择性地压制数据,以便在案件上诉时可以恢复这些数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信