On the Commitment Capacity of Reverse Elastic Channels

Amitalok J. Budkuley, Pranav Joshi, Manideep Mamindlapally, Anuj Kumar Yadav
{"title":"On the Commitment Capacity of Reverse Elastic Channels","authors":"Amitalok J. Budkuley, Pranav Joshi, Manideep Mamindlapally, Anuj Kumar Yadav","doi":"10.1109/ITW48936.2021.9611485","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this work, we study commitment over a class of channels called reverse elastic channels (RECs). In the commitment problem, two mutually distrustful parties, say Alice and Bob, seek to commit on a bit string available to Alice. The parties interact via a commitment protocol comprising two phases, viz., commit phase followed by reveal phase. Alice commits to a string, and transmits it to Bob securely in a manner Bob cannot learn it until Alice chooses to reveal it; at the time of reveal, however, Bob can successfully detect if Alice cheats. It is well known that noisy channels are a promising resource to realize information-theoretically secure commitment; however, oftentimes, channel behaviour may be poorly characterized thereby limiting the commitment throughput and/or degrading the security guarantees. Particularly problematic is a scenario where dishonest parties can actively alter the channel characteristics. RECs are an interesting class of such unreliable channels, where essentially only a dishonest committer Alice can meaningfully alter the channel; RECs have attracted active recent interest. Our principal contribution is the REC commitment capacity characterization for all parameters; this proves a recent related conjecture. Apart from presenting an achievable scheme, a key result in our work is a tight converse which analyses a specific cheating strategy by Alice. The significance of RECs stems from the fact that along with elastic channels (ECs), where only a dishonest receiver Bob can alter the channel, these two channel models represent special cases of the more widely studied unfair noisy channels (UNCs). Interestingly, for a given set of parameters, our result shows that the REC commitment capacity is no larger than that for the ECs. Furthermore, similar to the ECs, RECs offer non-trivial commitment throughput for all meaningful parameters; this is in stark contrast to UNCs where the throughput may possibly be zero.","PeriodicalId":325229,"journal":{"name":"2021 IEEE Information Theory Workshop (ITW)","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 IEEE Information Theory Workshop (ITW)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ITW48936.2021.9611485","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

In this work, we study commitment over a class of channels called reverse elastic channels (RECs). In the commitment problem, two mutually distrustful parties, say Alice and Bob, seek to commit on a bit string available to Alice. The parties interact via a commitment protocol comprising two phases, viz., commit phase followed by reveal phase. Alice commits to a string, and transmits it to Bob securely in a manner Bob cannot learn it until Alice chooses to reveal it; at the time of reveal, however, Bob can successfully detect if Alice cheats. It is well known that noisy channels are a promising resource to realize information-theoretically secure commitment; however, oftentimes, channel behaviour may be poorly characterized thereby limiting the commitment throughput and/or degrading the security guarantees. Particularly problematic is a scenario where dishonest parties can actively alter the channel characteristics. RECs are an interesting class of such unreliable channels, where essentially only a dishonest committer Alice can meaningfully alter the channel; RECs have attracted active recent interest. Our principal contribution is the REC commitment capacity characterization for all parameters; this proves a recent related conjecture. Apart from presenting an achievable scheme, a key result in our work is a tight converse which analyses a specific cheating strategy by Alice. The significance of RECs stems from the fact that along with elastic channels (ECs), where only a dishonest receiver Bob can alter the channel, these two channel models represent special cases of the more widely studied unfair noisy channels (UNCs). Interestingly, for a given set of parameters, our result shows that the REC commitment capacity is no larger than that for the ECs. Furthermore, similar to the ECs, RECs offer non-trivial commitment throughput for all meaningful parameters; this is in stark contrast to UNCs where the throughput may possibly be zero.
逆向弹性通道的承诺能力研究
在这项工作中,我们研究了一类称为反向弹性通道(RECs)的承诺。在承诺问题中,两个互不信任的当事方,比如Alice和Bob,试图在Alice可用的位串上进行承诺。各方通过承诺协议进行交互,承诺协议包括两个阶段,即提交阶段,然后是披露阶段。爱丽丝提交了一个字符串,并以一种鲍勃无法学习的方式安全地传输给鲍勃,直到爱丽丝选择泄露它;然而,在揭示的时候,鲍勃可以成功地检测到爱丽丝是否作弊。众所周知,噪声信道是实现信息理论上安全承诺的一种很有前途的资源;然而,通常情况下,通道行为的特征可能很差,从而限制了承诺吞吐量和/或降低了安全保证。特别有问题的是,不诚实的各方可以主动改变渠道特征。RECs是一类有趣的不可靠通道,本质上只有不诚实的提交者Alice才能有意地改变通道;RECs最近引起了人们的积极兴趣。我们的主要贡献是所有参数的REC承诺能力表征;这证明了最近的一个相关猜想。除了提出一个可实现的方案外,我们的工作中的一个关键结果是分析了Alice的特定作弊策略的紧逆。RECs的重要性源于弹性信道(ECs),其中只有不诚实的接收方Bob可以改变信道,这两种信道模型代表了更广泛研究的不公平噪声信道(unc)的特殊情况。有趣的是,对于给定的一组参数,我们的结果表明,REC的承诺能力并不比ec的承诺能力大。此外,与ec类似,RECs为所有有意义的参数提供重要的承诺吞吐量;这与吞吐量可能为零的unc形成鲜明对比。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信