Iran and the Diaspora: Irreconcilable Divisions?

Laetitia Nanquette
{"title":"Iran and the Diaspora: Irreconcilable Divisions?","authors":"Laetitia Nanquette","doi":"10.3366/edinburgh/9781474486378.003.0007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter argues that the Iranian diaspora is a case of a diaspora spread widely, that is relatively well-connected otherwise, but not when it comes to global literary exchanges. It reflects on the division that exists between literary practitioners who leave Iran and those who stay. I also study some examples of attempts to overcome the division of the diaspora as well as the blockages to cooperation, such as the initiatives of the publishers Naakojaa and Candle & Fog, and literary blogs in the diaspora based on interviews and case studies with literary practitioners from the US, the UK, Iran, France and Australia.","PeriodicalId":277741,"journal":{"name":"Iranian Literature after the Islamic Revolution","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Iranian Literature after the Islamic Revolution","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3366/edinburgh/9781474486378.003.0007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This chapter argues that the Iranian diaspora is a case of a diaspora spread widely, that is relatively well-connected otherwise, but not when it comes to global literary exchanges. It reflects on the division that exists between literary practitioners who leave Iran and those who stay. I also study some examples of attempts to overcome the division of the diaspora as well as the blockages to cooperation, such as the initiatives of the publishers Naakojaa and Candle & Fog, and literary blogs in the diaspora based on interviews and case studies with literary practitioners from the US, the UK, Iran, France and Australia.
伊朗和移民:不可调和的分歧?
本章认为,伊朗侨民是一个广泛传播的侨民,在其他方面相对良好,但在全球文学交流方面则不然。它反映了离开伊朗和留在伊朗的文学从业者之间存在的分歧。我也研究了一些试图克服散居侨民分裂和合作障碍的例子,如Naakojaa和Candle & Fog出版商的倡议,以及基于对美国、英国、伊朗、法国和澳大利亚文学从业者的采访和案例研究的散居侨民文学博客。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信