Design and Optimization Method for a High Power Eddy Current Brake with a Magneto-isotropic Material Structure for the Use in Electrified Heavy Duty Trucks

C. Holtmann
{"title":"Design and Optimization Method for a High Power Eddy Current Brake with a Magneto-isotropic Material Structure for the Use in Electrified Heavy Duty Trucks","authors":"C. Holtmann","doi":"10.46720/8442002eb2020-ebs-017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In electric vehicle applications, the braking technology has changed so that a part of the kinetic energy can be fed back into the battery with the traction machine. However in the case of an emergency brake the required braking power in a car is about 8 times and in commercial vehicle applications about 30 times higher than the drive power rating. This circumstance is the reason for the continued necessity of mechanical friction brakes. In large commercial vehicle applications, retarder technologies have a long history of reducing the wear of the mechanical brakes and the maintenance costs. The combination of the electric drive train with a retarder allows to reduce the required size of a mechanical friction brake dramatically. However, the power density of retarders, especially of eddy current retarders are small compared to mechanical friction brakes. The reason for this is the need for a heavy magnetic excitation circuit, while mechanical brakes in addition to the brake disc only need a caliper. From an electromagnetic point of view, the power density of eddy current brakes has been increased by various measures. One of the most effective measures to increase power density from an electromagnetic viewpoint is to apply a thin layer of highly conductive material to the surface of the active eddy current material, as shown in [1]. However, when this type of eddy current brake is optimized for high speeds, the power density is limited by the thermal behavior. From a thermal point of view conventional eddy current brakes are comparable to mechanical brakes because the braking power is converted to heat in a solid disc. Also in detail, both are comparable, since the skin effect ensures that the heat arises as in a mechanical friction brake only in a thin layer on the material surface of the disc. In consequence conventional eddy current brakes can never reach the power density of mechanical friction brakes. In order to reduce the possibility of overheating, a patent [2] describes a liquid-cooled eddy current brake which can also be flooded from the rotor side with water to cool the eddy-current material. The disadvantage of this eddy current brake is that the rotor rotates in the water and the torque cannot be controlled quickly. Another possibility is to place small cooling channels near the surface where the eddy currents occur, as shown in [3], but the cooling channels near the surface weaken the primary magnetic field and the torque density decreases.In this work, an eddy current brake with a magneto-isotropic material structure that eliminates the skin effect is shown. The eddy currents and the heat are thus distributed almost homogeneously in the material. The material structure consists of steel pins that transfer the magnetic flux from the poles through perforated aluminum sheets [4]. Coolant flows between the aluminum sheets and the number and thickness of the sheets can be selected almost freely, thereby dramatically increasing the surface area in contact with the cooling liquid. The work focuses primarily on the concept and the design and optimization method based on electromagnetic and thermal models for the active material as well as for the excitation windings. The electromagnetic model for calculating the torque as a result of the eddy currents is validated with an error of less than 10%. Further, the results of the optimization method show that in emergency braking more than 70% of the braking energy can be converted with the eddy current brake shown here at a power density of approx. 9 kW / kg. [1] Anwar, S., and R. C. Stevenson. ”Torque characteristics analysis for optimal design of a copper-layered eddy current brakesystem.” International Journal of Automotive Technology 12.4 2011): 497-502. [2] Seiwald, A., Liquid cooled eddy current brake. Publication Date 2008/03/13. WO.Patent WO2008028673 A1 [3] Flach, E., Wirbelstrombremse. Publication Date 2013/05/11. DE.Patent DE10122985 B4 [4] Holtmann, C, Elektrodynamische Bremse. Puplication Date 2017/11/16. DE.Patent DE102016108646 B4","PeriodicalId":254446,"journal":{"name":"EuroBrake 2020 Technical Programme","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EuroBrake 2020 Technical Programme","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46720/8442002eb2020-ebs-017","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

In electric vehicle applications, the braking technology has changed so that a part of the kinetic energy can be fed back into the battery with the traction machine. However in the case of an emergency brake the required braking power in a car is about 8 times and in commercial vehicle applications about 30 times higher than the drive power rating. This circumstance is the reason for the continued necessity of mechanical friction brakes. In large commercial vehicle applications, retarder technologies have a long history of reducing the wear of the mechanical brakes and the maintenance costs. The combination of the electric drive train with a retarder allows to reduce the required size of a mechanical friction brake dramatically. However, the power density of retarders, especially of eddy current retarders are small compared to mechanical friction brakes. The reason for this is the need for a heavy magnetic excitation circuit, while mechanical brakes in addition to the brake disc only need a caliper. From an electromagnetic point of view, the power density of eddy current brakes has been increased by various measures. One of the most effective measures to increase power density from an electromagnetic viewpoint is to apply a thin layer of highly conductive material to the surface of the active eddy current material, as shown in [1]. However, when this type of eddy current brake is optimized for high speeds, the power density is limited by the thermal behavior. From a thermal point of view conventional eddy current brakes are comparable to mechanical brakes because the braking power is converted to heat in a solid disc. Also in detail, both are comparable, since the skin effect ensures that the heat arises as in a mechanical friction brake only in a thin layer on the material surface of the disc. In consequence conventional eddy current brakes can never reach the power density of mechanical friction brakes. In order to reduce the possibility of overheating, a patent [2] describes a liquid-cooled eddy current brake which can also be flooded from the rotor side with water to cool the eddy-current material. The disadvantage of this eddy current brake is that the rotor rotates in the water and the torque cannot be controlled quickly. Another possibility is to place small cooling channels near the surface where the eddy currents occur, as shown in [3], but the cooling channels near the surface weaken the primary magnetic field and the torque density decreases.In this work, an eddy current brake with a magneto-isotropic material structure that eliminates the skin effect is shown. The eddy currents and the heat are thus distributed almost homogeneously in the material. The material structure consists of steel pins that transfer the magnetic flux from the poles through perforated aluminum sheets [4]. Coolant flows between the aluminum sheets and the number and thickness of the sheets can be selected almost freely, thereby dramatically increasing the surface area in contact with the cooling liquid. The work focuses primarily on the concept and the design and optimization method based on electromagnetic and thermal models for the active material as well as for the excitation windings. The electromagnetic model for calculating the torque as a result of the eddy currents is validated with an error of less than 10%. Further, the results of the optimization method show that in emergency braking more than 70% of the braking energy can be converted with the eddy current brake shown here at a power density of approx. 9 kW / kg. [1] Anwar, S., and R. C. Stevenson. ”Torque characteristics analysis for optimal design of a copper-layered eddy current brakesystem.” International Journal of Automotive Technology 12.4 2011): 497-502. [2] Seiwald, A., Liquid cooled eddy current brake. Publication Date 2008/03/13. WO.Patent WO2008028673 A1 [3] Flach, E., Wirbelstrombremse. Publication Date 2013/05/11. DE.Patent DE10122985 B4 [4] Holtmann, C, Elektrodynamische Bremse. Puplication Date 2017/11/16. DE.Patent DE102016108646 B4
电气化重型卡车用磁各向同性材料结构大功率涡流制动器设计与优化方法
在电动汽车的应用中,制动技术发生了变化,使得部分动能可以通过牵引机反馈到电池中。然而,在紧急制动的情况下,汽车所需的制动功率大约是驱动功率的8倍,在商用车应用中大约是驱动功率的30倍。这种情况是继续需要机械摩擦制动器的原因。在大型商用车应用中,缓速器技术在减少机械制动器的磨损和降低维修成本方面有着悠久的历史。电动传动系统与缓速器的结合可以显著减少机械摩擦制动器所需的尺寸。然而,与机械摩擦制动器相比,缓速器,特别是涡流缓速器的功率密度较小。这样做的原因是需要一个重磁激励电路,而机械制动器除了制动盘只需要一个卡钳。从电磁角度来看,通过各种措施提高了涡流制动器的功率密度。从电磁学角度来看,提高功率密度最有效的措施之一是在有源涡流材料表面涂上一层薄的高导电性材料,如图[1]所示。然而,当这种类型的涡流制动器被优化为高速时,功率密度受到热行为的限制。从热的角度来看,传统的涡流制动器可与机械制动器相媲美,因为制动功率在固体圆盘中转换为热量。同样在细节上,两者都是可比较的,因为集肤效应确保热量像机械摩擦制动器一样只在圆盘材料表面的薄层中产生。因此,传统的涡流制动器无法达到机械摩擦制动器的功率密度。为了减少过热的可能性,一项专利[2]描述了一种液冷涡流制动器,也可以从转子侧注入水来冷却涡流材料。这种涡流制动器的缺点是转子在水中旋转,转矩不能快速控制。另一种可能性是在涡流发生的表面附近放置小的冷却通道,如图[3]所示,但靠近表面的冷却通道会减弱一次磁场,转矩密度降低。在这项工作中,展示了具有磁性各向同性材料结构的涡流制动器,消除了集肤效应。因此,涡流和热量几乎均匀地分布在材料中。材料结构由钢钉组成,通过穿孔铝板将磁通量从极点传递出去[4]。冷却剂在铝板之间流动,铝板的数量和厚度几乎可以自由选择,从而大大增加与冷却液接触的表面积。工作主要集中在基于电磁和热模型的活性材料和励磁绕组的概念、设计和优化方法。验证了涡流对转矩的电磁计算模型,误差小于10%。此外,优化方法的结果表明,在紧急制动时,涡流制动器可以在功率密度约为的情况下转换70%以上的制动能量。9kw / kg。[1]安华,S.和R. C.史蒂文森。铜层涡流制动系统优化设计的转矩特性分析。国际汽车技术学报,2011(4):497-502。[2]刘志强,刘志强。液冷涡流制动器。出版日期:2008/03/13卧室。专利WO2008028673 A1 [3] Flach, E., Wirbelstrombremse。出版日期:2013/05/11[4]李建军,李建军,李建军,等。申请日期2017/11/16。专利编号:DE102016108646 B4
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信