Structured telemedicine: Economic aspects

M. Fidrich, T. Gyimóthy, J. Borbás, G. Stubnya
{"title":"Structured telemedicine: Economic aspects","authors":"M. Fidrich, T. Gyimóthy, J. Borbás, G. Stubnya","doi":"10.1109/NC.2017.8263261","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the field of telemedicine, one of the biggest challenge is to find the right solution corresponding to customers' needs in terms of usability and business model. Though 259,000 mobile health apps are available worldwide, only a small portion accounts for the majority of the market. Half of the downloads come from less than 100 applications, 62% of mHealth app publishers earn less than USD 10,000 or have no revenue, while the top 3% makes over USD 5 million. According to our experience, the discoverability of telemedicine applications is rather poor and users' demand could not meet the vast supply. It is difficult to find proper solutions mostly because of the lack of adequate categorization. Hence it is important to recommend and systematically apply a comprehensive categorization, accepted by major stakeholders. Though there have been various attempts, so far the disciplines involved (medicine, IT and economics) could not provide a relevant classification. We would recommend the following categorization aspects: Target audience — operating environment — medical discipline — type of application — sensor could determine the possible application more clearly. Finally, legal & business aspects are also included, in response to different audits and pricing mechanisms of telemedicine applications.","PeriodicalId":140536,"journal":{"name":"2017 IEEE 30th Neumann Colloquium (NC)","volume":"62 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 IEEE 30th Neumann Colloquium (NC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/NC.2017.8263261","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the field of telemedicine, one of the biggest challenge is to find the right solution corresponding to customers' needs in terms of usability and business model. Though 259,000 mobile health apps are available worldwide, only a small portion accounts for the majority of the market. Half of the downloads come from less than 100 applications, 62% of mHealth app publishers earn less than USD 10,000 or have no revenue, while the top 3% makes over USD 5 million. According to our experience, the discoverability of telemedicine applications is rather poor and users' demand could not meet the vast supply. It is difficult to find proper solutions mostly because of the lack of adequate categorization. Hence it is important to recommend and systematically apply a comprehensive categorization, accepted by major stakeholders. Though there have been various attempts, so far the disciplines involved (medicine, IT and economics) could not provide a relevant classification. We would recommend the following categorization aspects: Target audience — operating environment — medical discipline — type of application — sensor could determine the possible application more clearly. Finally, legal & business aspects are also included, in response to different audits and pricing mechanisms of telemedicine applications.
结构化远程医疗:经济方面
在远程医疗领域,最大的挑战之一是在可用性和商业模式方面找到与客户需求相对应的正确解决方案。尽管全球有25.9万个移动健康应用程序,但只有一小部分占据了大部分市场。一半的下载量来自不到100个应用程序,62%的移动健康应用程序发行商收入不到1万美元或没有收入,而前3%的发行商收入超过500万美元。根据我们的经验,远程医疗应用的可发现性很差,用户的需求无法满足巨大的供应。很难找到合适的解决方案,主要是因为缺乏充分的分类。因此,重要的是建议并系统地应用主要利益相关者接受的综合分类。尽管有各种各样的尝试,但到目前为止,所涉及的学科(医学、信息技术和经济学)无法提供相关的分类。我们建议从以下方面进行分类:目标受众-操作环境-医学学科-应用类型-传感器可以更清楚地确定可能的应用。最后,还包括法律和商业方面,以响应远程医疗应用的不同审计和定价机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信