{"title":"COMPARISON BETWEEN OFFLINE AND ONLINE PHYSICAL EDUCATION LEARNING OUTCOMES: AN EX POST FACTO RESEARCH AT SMA NEGERI 30 BANDA MALUKU, CENTRAL MALUKU","authors":"Andi Ariyanto, Emma Rumahlewang, Jonas Solissa","doi":"10.30598/manggurebevol3no1page18-26","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The offline and online learning processes, which are fundamentally differ, have their own obstacles for students. Especially in online learning, which still has several obstacles, such as low mastery of technology. It can affect the process of student understanding of the material taught by the teacher and will also affect student learning outcomes. This study aims to determine the comparison of physical education learning outcomes offline and online at SMA Negeri 30 Banda Maluku Tengah students. The method used in this research is quantitative using an ex post facto approach. The population in this study were students of class XI MIA-2 at SMA Negeri 30 Banda Maluku Tengah, 25 students in total. The sample used is all students of class XI MIA-2. Based on the results of data processing, the results of the t-test comparison of offline and online physical education learning outcomes obtained t-count is 2.85. While the t table is 2.06. This means that t arithmetic > t table (2.85 > 2.06) then the alternative hypothesis (Ha) is accepted. So there is a significant comparison between offline and online physical education learning outcomes for students at SMA N 30 Banda Maluku Tengah. The existence of factors that can affect student learning outcomes, such as the constraints of students who do not have smartphones or cellphones to take part in online learning, has led to a comparison of learning outcomes between offline and online learning.","PeriodicalId":342156,"journal":{"name":"MANGGUREBE: Journal Physical Education, Health and Recreation","volume":"68 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MANGGUREBE: Journal Physical Education, Health and Recreation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30598/manggurebevol3no1page18-26","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The offline and online learning processes, which are fundamentally differ, have their own obstacles for students. Especially in online learning, which still has several obstacles, such as low mastery of technology. It can affect the process of student understanding of the material taught by the teacher and will also affect student learning outcomes. This study aims to determine the comparison of physical education learning outcomes offline and online at SMA Negeri 30 Banda Maluku Tengah students. The method used in this research is quantitative using an ex post facto approach. The population in this study were students of class XI MIA-2 at SMA Negeri 30 Banda Maluku Tengah, 25 students in total. The sample used is all students of class XI MIA-2. Based on the results of data processing, the results of the t-test comparison of offline and online physical education learning outcomes obtained t-count is 2.85. While the t table is 2.06. This means that t arithmetic > t table (2.85 > 2.06) then the alternative hypothesis (Ha) is accepted. So there is a significant comparison between offline and online physical education learning outcomes for students at SMA N 30 Banda Maluku Tengah. The existence of factors that can affect student learning outcomes, such as the constraints of students who do not have smartphones or cellphones to take part in online learning, has led to a comparison of learning outcomes between offline and online learning.
离线和在线的学习过程有着本质的不同,对学生来说也有各自的障碍。尤其是在线学习,它仍然存在一些障碍,比如对技术的掌握程度不高。它会影响学生对教师所教材料的理解过程,也会影响学生的学习成果。本研究旨在确定SMA Negeri 30名班达马鲁古登加学生的离线和在线体育学习成果的比较。在这项研究中使用的方法是定量使用事后的方法。根据数据处理结果,线下与线上体育学习成果的t检验比较结果得到t-count为2.85。而t表是2.06。这意味着t算术>表(2.85 > 2.06),然后备选假设(Ha)被接受。因此,在Banda Maluku Tengah SMA n30学生的线下和在线体育学习成果之间存在显著的比较。影响学生学习成果的因素的存在,例如没有智能手机或手机的学生参与在线学习的限制,导致了离线和在线学习的学习成果比较。