Quantifiers

J. Studd
{"title":"Quantifiers","authors":"J. Studd","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198719649.003.0003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The notion of quantification is clearly central to the absolutist’s characteristic claim that we sometimes quantify over an absolutely comprehensive domain. Barwise and Cooper give a widely accepted semantics for natural language quantifiers, building on the usual model-theoretic semantics for first-order languages. But only a relativist about quantifiers can take these semantic theories at face value. An absolutist who denies that absolutely general quantifiers range over a set-domain may seek to free these semantic theories from their set-theoretic trappings by employing plural and superplural resources. More radically, he may reject the Barwise–Cooper semantics altogether. This chapter argues that neither approach is cost-free.","PeriodicalId":272038,"journal":{"name":"Everything, more or less","volume":"170 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Everything, more or less","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198719649.003.0003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The notion of quantification is clearly central to the absolutist’s characteristic claim that we sometimes quantify over an absolutely comprehensive domain. Barwise and Cooper give a widely accepted semantics for natural language quantifiers, building on the usual model-theoretic semantics for first-order languages. But only a relativist about quantifiers can take these semantic theories at face value. An absolutist who denies that absolutely general quantifiers range over a set-domain may seek to free these semantic theories from their set-theoretic trappings by employing plural and superplural resources. More radically, he may reject the Barwise–Cooper semantics altogether. This chapter argues that neither approach is cost-free.
量词
量化的概念显然是绝对主义者的特征主张的核心,即我们有时在一个绝对全面的领域进行量化。Barwise和Cooper在一阶语言常用的模型理论语义的基础上,给出了一种被广泛接受的自然语言量词语义。但只有量词的相对论者才能从表面上理解这些语义理论。一个绝对论者否认绝对一般量词在集合域上的范围,可能会通过使用复数和超复数资源来寻求将这些语义理论从集合论的陷阱中解放出来。更激进的是,他可能完全拒绝Barwise-Cooper语义。本章认为,这两种方法都不是没有成本的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信