A review of mass concentrations of Bramblings Fringilla montifringilla: implications for assessment of large numbers of birds

T. Svensson
{"title":"A review of mass concentrations of Bramblings Fringilla montifringilla: implications for assessment of large numbers of birds","authors":"T. Svensson","doi":"10.34080/OS.V31.22031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Mass concentrations of birds, or lack of such, is a phenomenon of great ecological and domestic significance. Apart from being and indicator for e.g. food availability, ecological change and population size, it is also a source of conflict between humans and birds. Moreover, massive gatherings or colonies of birds also get the attention of the public -- either as a spectacular phenomenon or as an unwelcome pest -- thereby forming the public perception of birds and their abundance. In the context of the mass concentration of bramblings (Fringilla montifringilla) in Sweden the winter 2019-2020, this work reviews the literature on this striking phenomenon. Winter roosts are found to amount to on the order of one million birds per hectare of roost area, but the spread between reports is significant. Support for roosts of up to around 15 million birds was found, but much larger numbers are frequently recited in the literature. It is argued that these larger numbers are the result of overestimation or, in some cases, even completely unfounded (potentially typos). While the difficulties related to the count of large numbers of birds can explain this state, it is unfortunate that \"high numbers\" sometimes displace proper numbers. Since incorrect data, and its persistence, may result in that incorrect conclusions are drawn from new observations, this matter deserves attention. As the Brambling is a well-studied species, the matter also raises concerns regarding numbers for mass concentrations of other species. It is recommended that very large numbers of birds should be recited and used with care: underlying data and methods of the original sources should be scrutinized. Analogously, reporters of large numbers of birds are advised to describe and document counting methods. In particular, number estimates based on flock volume and bird density should be avoided.","PeriodicalId":119149,"journal":{"name":"arXiv: Quantitative Methods","volume":"59 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv: Quantitative Methods","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34080/OS.V31.22031","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Mass concentrations of birds, or lack of such, is a phenomenon of great ecological and domestic significance. Apart from being and indicator for e.g. food availability, ecological change and population size, it is also a source of conflict between humans and birds. Moreover, massive gatherings or colonies of birds also get the attention of the public -- either as a spectacular phenomenon or as an unwelcome pest -- thereby forming the public perception of birds and their abundance. In the context of the mass concentration of bramblings (Fringilla montifringilla) in Sweden the winter 2019-2020, this work reviews the literature on this striking phenomenon. Winter roosts are found to amount to on the order of one million birds per hectare of roost area, but the spread between reports is significant. Support for roosts of up to around 15 million birds was found, but much larger numbers are frequently recited in the literature. It is argued that these larger numbers are the result of overestimation or, in some cases, even completely unfounded (potentially typos). While the difficulties related to the count of large numbers of birds can explain this state, it is unfortunate that "high numbers" sometimes displace proper numbers. Since incorrect data, and its persistence, may result in that incorrect conclusions are drawn from new observations, this matter deserves attention. As the Brambling is a well-studied species, the matter also raises concerns regarding numbers for mass concentrations of other species. It is recommended that very large numbers of birds should be recited and used with care: underlying data and methods of the original sources should be scrutinized. Analogously, reporters of large numbers of birds are advised to describe and document counting methods. In particular, number estimates based on flock volume and bird density should be avoided.
白杨的质量浓度综述:对大量鸟类评估的意义
鸟类的大量聚集或缺乏,是一种具有重大生态和家庭意义的现象。除了是食物供应、生态变化和人口规模等方面的指标外,它也是人类与鸟类之间冲突的根源。此外,大量聚集或成群的鸟类也引起了公众的注意——要么是作为一种壮观的现象,要么是作为一种不受欢迎的害虫——从而形成了公众对鸟类及其数量的认识。在2019-2020年冬季瑞典大量集中的树莓(Fringilla montifringilla)的背景下,本工作回顾了关于这一惊人现象的文献。据发现,冬季栖息的鸟类数量约为每公顷栖息面积100万只,但报告之间的差异很大。支持多达1500万只鸟的栖息地被发现,但在文献中经常引用更大的数字。有人认为,这些较大的数字是高估的结果,或者在某些情况下,甚至是完全没有根据的(潜在的打字错误)。虽然与大量鸟类计数有关的困难可以解释这种状态,但不幸的是,“高数量”有时取代了适当的数量。由于不正确的数据及其持续存在可能导致从新的观察中得出不正确的结论,因此这个问题值得注意。由于Brambling是一个被充分研究的物种,这个问题也引起了人们对其他物种质量浓度的关注。建议应谨慎地背诵和使用大量的鸟类:应仔细审查原始来源的基础数据和方法。类似地,建议大量鸟类的记者描述和记录计数方法。特别是,应避免根据鸟群数量和鸟类密度来估计数量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信