The Perceptions of Caregivers and other Stakeholders on the Usefulness of the Child Support Grant: The Case Study of Emalahleni, Nkangala District

Tricxy Maureen Ubisi, Ricky Munyaradzi Mukonza, Kabelo Boikhutso Moeti
{"title":"The Perceptions of Caregivers and other Stakeholders on the Usefulness of the Child Support Grant: The Case Study of Emalahleni, Nkangala District","authors":"Tricxy Maureen Ubisi, Ricky Munyaradzi Mukonza, Kabelo Boikhutso Moeti","doi":"10.31920/2634-3649/2022/v13n2a13","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The South African government faces the triple challenge of poverty, unemployment and inequalities. This article focuses on the challenge of poverty. One of the ways in which the government of South Africa seeks to address the challenge of poverty is through the Child Support Grant (CSG) programme that was first implemented in 1998. The Child Support Grant is intended to ensure that the basic needs of the children of a vulnerable group of society are met. The context is Emalahleni Local Municipality, and the main objective is to investigate the perceptions of caregivers on the utilisation of the Child Support Grant. The study adopted qualitative research which focuses on the issues to be understood by applying qualitative measures. In this regard, qualitative data collection and analysis methods and primary and secondary data were used. The primary data was collected through a survey that focused on the residents of Emalahleni Local Municipality. Key findings of the study are that the Child Support Grant improves households’ ability to meet basic needs such as food and clothing. In addition, the grants assists families make investments in education, which increases the chances of breaking the cycle of poverty. However, there was some evidence from community members (who are not caregivers) suggesting that there are cases of abuse of Child Support Grant money by some recipients in the community. As a result of this, the researchers suggest that SASSA must employ social workers directly to monitor whether caregivers use the grants for the intended purpose, which is to take care of the needs of beneficiaries. This, however, does not in any way suggest that the Child Support grant is not making a positive impact on recipient households. The article makes a contribution to the body of knowledge by providing empirically backed conclusions on this important social security intervention by the South African government.","PeriodicalId":421107,"journal":{"name":"African Journal of Development Studies (formerly AFFRIKA Journal of Politics, Economics and Society)","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"African Journal of Development Studies (formerly AFFRIKA Journal of Politics, Economics and Society)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31920/2634-3649/2022/v13n2a13","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The South African government faces the triple challenge of poverty, unemployment and inequalities. This article focuses on the challenge of poverty. One of the ways in which the government of South Africa seeks to address the challenge of poverty is through the Child Support Grant (CSG) programme that was first implemented in 1998. The Child Support Grant is intended to ensure that the basic needs of the children of a vulnerable group of society are met. The context is Emalahleni Local Municipality, and the main objective is to investigate the perceptions of caregivers on the utilisation of the Child Support Grant. The study adopted qualitative research which focuses on the issues to be understood by applying qualitative measures. In this regard, qualitative data collection and analysis methods and primary and secondary data were used. The primary data was collected through a survey that focused on the residents of Emalahleni Local Municipality. Key findings of the study are that the Child Support Grant improves households’ ability to meet basic needs such as food and clothing. In addition, the grants assists families make investments in education, which increases the chances of breaking the cycle of poverty. However, there was some evidence from community members (who are not caregivers) suggesting that there are cases of abuse of Child Support Grant money by some recipients in the community. As a result of this, the researchers suggest that SASSA must employ social workers directly to monitor whether caregivers use the grants for the intended purpose, which is to take care of the needs of beneficiaries. This, however, does not in any way suggest that the Child Support grant is not making a positive impact on recipient households. The article makes a contribution to the body of knowledge by providing empirically backed conclusions on this important social security intervention by the South African government.
照顾者和其他利益相关者对儿童抚养补助金有用性的看法:以Nkangala地区Emalahleni为例
南非政府面临着贫困、失业和不平等的三重挑战。这篇文章的重点是贫困的挑战。南非政府寻求解决贫困挑战的方法之一是通过1998年首次实施的儿童抚养补助金(CSG)方案。儿童支助补助金旨在确保满足社会弱势群体儿童的基本需要。背景是Emalahleni地方市政府,主要目标是调查照顾者对儿童抚养补助金使用情况的看法。本研究采用定性研究的方法,重点关注应用定性方法所要理解的问题。在这方面,定性的数据收集和分析方法和主要和次要数据。主要数据是通过对Emalahleni地方自治市居民的调查收集的。这项研究的主要发现是,儿童抚养补助金提高了家庭满足衣食等基本需求的能力。此外,赠款还帮助家庭投资于教育,这增加了打破贫穷循环的机会。然而,有一些来自社区成员(他们不是看护人)的证据表明,社区中有一些儿童抚养补助金接受者滥用儿童抚养补助金的情况。因此,研究人员建议SASSA必须直接雇用社会工作者来监督护理人员是否将补助金用于预期目的,即照顾受益人的需求。然而,这绝不意味着儿童抚养费对受助家庭没有产生积极影响。本文通过对南非政府这一重要的社会安全干预提供实证支持的结论,为知识体系做出了贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信