{"title":"CELIA: Cost-Time Performance of Elastic Applications on Cloud","authors":"Sunimal Rathnayake, Dumitrel Loghin, Y. M. Teo","doi":"10.1109/ICPP.2017.43","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Clouds offer great flexibility for scaling applications due to the wide spectrum of resources with different cost-performance, inherent resource elasticity and pay-peruse charging. However, determining cost-time-efficient cloud configurations to execute a given application in the large resource configuration space remains a key challenge. The growing importance of elastic applications for which the accuracy is a function of resource consumption introduces new opportunities to exploit resource elasticity on clouds. In this paper, we introduce CELIA, a measurement-driven analytical modeling approach to determine cost-time-optimal cloud resource configurations to execute a given elastic application with a time deadline and a cost budget. We evaluate CELIA with three representative elastic applications on more than ten million configurations consisting of Amazon EC2 resource types with different cost-performance. Using CELIA, we show that multiple cost-time Pareto-optimal configurations exist among feasible cloud configurations that execute an elastic application within a time deadline and cost budget. These Pareto-optimal configurations exhibit up to 30% cost savings for an elastic application representing n-body simulation. We investigate the impact of fixed-time scaling on the cost of executing elastic applications on cloud. We show that cost gradient with respect to resource demand is smaller when cloud resources with better cost-performance are used. Furthermore, we show that the relative increase in cost is always smaller compared to the relative reduction of execution time deadline. For example, tightening the execution time deadline by two-thirds incurs only 40% increase in cost for the n-body simulation application.","PeriodicalId":392710,"journal":{"name":"2017 46th International Conference on Parallel Processing (ICPP)","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 46th International Conference on Parallel Processing (ICPP)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICPP.2017.43","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9
Abstract
Clouds offer great flexibility for scaling applications due to the wide spectrum of resources with different cost-performance, inherent resource elasticity and pay-peruse charging. However, determining cost-time-efficient cloud configurations to execute a given application in the large resource configuration space remains a key challenge. The growing importance of elastic applications for which the accuracy is a function of resource consumption introduces new opportunities to exploit resource elasticity on clouds. In this paper, we introduce CELIA, a measurement-driven analytical modeling approach to determine cost-time-optimal cloud resource configurations to execute a given elastic application with a time deadline and a cost budget. We evaluate CELIA with three representative elastic applications on more than ten million configurations consisting of Amazon EC2 resource types with different cost-performance. Using CELIA, we show that multiple cost-time Pareto-optimal configurations exist among feasible cloud configurations that execute an elastic application within a time deadline and cost budget. These Pareto-optimal configurations exhibit up to 30% cost savings for an elastic application representing n-body simulation. We investigate the impact of fixed-time scaling on the cost of executing elastic applications on cloud. We show that cost gradient with respect to resource demand is smaller when cloud resources with better cost-performance are used. Furthermore, we show that the relative increase in cost is always smaller compared to the relative reduction of execution time deadline. For example, tightening the execution time deadline by two-thirds incurs only 40% increase in cost for the n-body simulation application.