Formal definitions for usable access control rule sets from goals to metrics

Matthias Beckerle, L. Martucci
{"title":"Formal definitions for usable access control rule sets from goals to metrics","authors":"Matthias Beckerle, L. Martucci","doi":"10.1145/2501604.2501606","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Access control policies describe high level requirements for access control systems. Access control rule sets ideally translate these policies into a coherent and manageable collection of Allow/Deny rules. Designing rule sets that reflect desired policies is a difficult and time-consuming task. The result is that rule sets are difficult to understand and manage. The goal of this paper is to provide means for obtaining usable access control rule sets, which we define as rule sets that (i) reflect the access control policy and (ii) are easy to understand and manage. In this paper, we formally define the challenges that users face when generating usable access control rule sets and provide formal tools to handle them more easily. We started our research with a pilot study in which specialists were interviewed. The objective was to list usability challenges regarding the management of access control rule sets and verify how those challenges were handled by specialists. The results of the pilot study were compared and combined with results from related work and refined into six novel, formally defined metrics that are used to measure the security and usability aspects of access control rule sets. We validated our findings with two user studies, which demonstrate that our metrics help users generate statistically significant better rule sets.","PeriodicalId":273244,"journal":{"name":"Symposium On Usable Privacy and Security","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"37","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Symposium On Usable Privacy and Security","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2501604.2501606","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 37

Abstract

Access control policies describe high level requirements for access control systems. Access control rule sets ideally translate these policies into a coherent and manageable collection of Allow/Deny rules. Designing rule sets that reflect desired policies is a difficult and time-consuming task. The result is that rule sets are difficult to understand and manage. The goal of this paper is to provide means for obtaining usable access control rule sets, which we define as rule sets that (i) reflect the access control policy and (ii) are easy to understand and manage. In this paper, we formally define the challenges that users face when generating usable access control rule sets and provide formal tools to handle them more easily. We started our research with a pilot study in which specialists were interviewed. The objective was to list usability challenges regarding the management of access control rule sets and verify how those challenges were handled by specialists. The results of the pilot study were compared and combined with results from related work and refined into six novel, formally defined metrics that are used to measure the security and usability aspects of access control rule sets. We validated our findings with two user studies, which demonstrate that our metrics help users generate statistically significant better rule sets.
从目标到度量的可用访问控制规则集的正式定义
访问控制策略描述了访问控制系统的高级需求。访问控制规则集理想地将这些策略转换为一致且可管理的允许/拒绝规则集合。设计反映所需策略的规则集是一项困难且耗时的任务。其结果是规则集难以理解和管理。本文的目标是提供获取可用访问控制规则集的方法,我们将其定义为(i)反映访问控制策略和(ii)易于理解和管理的规则集。在本文中,我们正式定义了用户在生成可用的访问控制规则集时面临的挑战,并提供了更容易处理这些挑战的正式工具。我们的研究开始于一项试点研究,在这项研究中,专家们接受了采访。目标是列出与访问控制规则集管理相关的可用性挑战,并验证专家如何处理这些挑战。将试点研究的结果与相关工作的结果进行比较和结合,并将其细化为六个新的、正式定义的度量标准,用于度量访问控制规则集的安全性和可用性方面。我们通过两个用户研究验证了我们的发现,这表明我们的指标可以帮助用户生成具有统计意义的更好的规则集。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信