Analyzing the trade-off between multiple memory controllers and memory channels on multi-core processor performance

J. Sancho, M. Lang, D. Kerbyson
{"title":"Analyzing the trade-off between multiple memory controllers and memory channels on multi-core processor performance","authors":"J. Sancho, M. Lang, D. Kerbyson","doi":"10.1109/IPDPSW.2010.5470812","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The increasing core-count on current and future processors is posing critical challenges to the memory subsystem to efficiently handle concurrent memory requests. The current trend is to increase the number of memory channels available to the processor's memory controller. In this paper we investigate the effectiveness of this approach on the performance of parallel scientific applications. Specifically, we explore the trade-off between employing multiple memory channels per memory controller and the use of multiple memory controllers. Experiments conducted on two current state-of-the-art multicore processors, a 6-core AMD Istanbul and a 4-core Intel Nehalem-EP, for a wide range of production applications shows that there is a diminishing return when increasing the number of memory channels per memory controller. In addition, we show that this performance degradation can be efficiently addressed by increasing the ratio of memory controllers to channels while keeping the number of memory channels constant. Significant performance improvements can be achieved in this scheme, up to 28%, in the case of using two memory controllers each with one channel compared with one controller with two memory channels.","PeriodicalId":329280,"journal":{"name":"2010 IEEE International Symposium on Parallel & Distributed Processing, Workshops and Phd Forum (IPDPSW)","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-04-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2010 IEEE International Symposium on Parallel & Distributed Processing, Workshops and Phd Forum (IPDPSW)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IPDPSW.2010.5470812","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

The increasing core-count on current and future processors is posing critical challenges to the memory subsystem to efficiently handle concurrent memory requests. The current trend is to increase the number of memory channels available to the processor's memory controller. In this paper we investigate the effectiveness of this approach on the performance of parallel scientific applications. Specifically, we explore the trade-off between employing multiple memory channels per memory controller and the use of multiple memory controllers. Experiments conducted on two current state-of-the-art multicore processors, a 6-core AMD Istanbul and a 4-core Intel Nehalem-EP, for a wide range of production applications shows that there is a diminishing return when increasing the number of memory channels per memory controller. In addition, we show that this performance degradation can be efficiently addressed by increasing the ratio of memory controllers to channels while keeping the number of memory channels constant. Significant performance improvements can be achieved in this scheme, up to 28%, in the case of using two memory controllers each with one channel compared with one controller with two memory channels.
分析多内存控制器和内存通道对多核处理器性能的影响
当前和未来处理器上不断增加的核数对内存子系统有效处理并发内存请求提出了严峻的挑战。当前的趋势是增加处理器内存控制器可用的内存通道的数量。在本文中,我们研究了这种方法对并行科学应用性能的有效性。具体来说,我们探讨了每个内存控制器使用多个内存通道和使用多个内存控制器之间的权衡。在两种当前最先进的多核处理器上进行的实验,6核AMD Istanbul和4核Intel Nehalem-EP,用于广泛的生产应用,表明当增加每个内存控制器的内存通道数量时,回报会递减。此外,我们还表明,在保持内存通道数量不变的同时,增加内存控制器与通道的比率可以有效地解决这种性能下降问题。在此方案中,使用两个内存控制器各具有一个通道的情况下,与使用一个控制器具有两个存储通道的情况相比,可以实现显著的性能改进,最高可达28%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信