Simulated Laboratory and Enriched Laboratory Guide Material Experiments as Catalysts for Improving Basic Science Students’ Achievement

S. J. Ogunkunle, M. K. Akinsola
{"title":"Simulated Laboratory and Enriched Laboratory Guide Material Experiments as Catalysts for Improving Basic Science Students’ Achievement","authors":"S. J. Ogunkunle, M. K. Akinsola","doi":"10.17265/2161-6248/2020.03.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Laboratory experiments promote conceptual understanding and enhance achievement in science. Inadequate exposure of students to basic science practical has weakened the foundation in science teaching and learning at the basic education level in Nigeria. Thus, students’ achievement in basic science failed to significantly predict later achievement in Biology, Chemistry, and Physics. Therefore, the study determined how achievement in basic science of male and female students with different future career interests in science are affected by simulated laboratory (SL) and enriched laboratory guide material (ELGM) experiments which were developed. Bruner’s constructivism provided the framework while the study utilised quasi experimental design having the pre-test-post-test control group with a 3 x 2 x 2 factorial matrix. The sample comprised 277 (130 males and 147 females; ± 17 years old) junior secondary three (JSIII) students randomly selected from six secondary schools of which equal number have functional Computer and Physics laboratories or without. Data were collected using Achievement test in basic science (r = 0.87) and future career interest in science (FCIS) (r = 0.99), while seven hypotheses were tested at 0.05 level of significance with the aid of analysis of covariance, estimated marginal means (EMM), and Scheffé post-hoc analysis. The findings of the study reveal that treatment and FCIS were significantly effective while gender had no significant effect on students’ achievement in basic science. It is, therefore, recommended that SL and ELGM experiments be used to teach basic science practical taking cognizance of students’ FCIS.","PeriodicalId":159185,"journal":{"name":"US-China education review","volume":"82 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"US-China education review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17265/2161-6248/2020.03.003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Laboratory experiments promote conceptual understanding and enhance achievement in science. Inadequate exposure of students to basic science practical has weakened the foundation in science teaching and learning at the basic education level in Nigeria. Thus, students’ achievement in basic science failed to significantly predict later achievement in Biology, Chemistry, and Physics. Therefore, the study determined how achievement in basic science of male and female students with different future career interests in science are affected by simulated laboratory (SL) and enriched laboratory guide material (ELGM) experiments which were developed. Bruner’s constructivism provided the framework while the study utilised quasi experimental design having the pre-test-post-test control group with a 3 x 2 x 2 factorial matrix. The sample comprised 277 (130 males and 147 females; ± 17 years old) junior secondary three (JSIII) students randomly selected from six secondary schools of which equal number have functional Computer and Physics laboratories or without. Data were collected using Achievement test in basic science (r = 0.87) and future career interest in science (FCIS) (r = 0.99), while seven hypotheses were tested at 0.05 level of significance with the aid of analysis of covariance, estimated marginal means (EMM), and Scheffé post-hoc analysis. The findings of the study reveal that treatment and FCIS were significantly effective while gender had no significant effect on students’ achievement in basic science. It is, therefore, recommended that SL and ELGM experiments be used to teach basic science practical taking cognizance of students’ FCIS.
模拟实验室与强化实验室引导材料实验对提高基础理科学生学习成绩的催化作用
实验室实验促进概念理解和提高科学成就。学生对基础科学实践的接触不足削弱了尼日利亚基础教育阶段科学教学的基础。因此,学生在基础科学方面的成绩不能显著预测以后在生物、化学和物理方面的成绩。因此,本研究确定了所开发的模拟实验室(SL)和丰富实验室指导材料(ELGM)实验对未来理科职业兴趣不同的男女生基础科学成绩的影响。Bruner的建构主义提供了框架,而研究采用准实验设计,采用3 × 2 × 2的阶乘矩阵进行前测后测对照组。样本包括277人(130名男性和147名女性;±17岁)初中三(JSIII)学生,随机从六所中学中抽取,这些中学中有或没有功能计算机和物理实验室的人数相等。采用基础科学成就检验(r = 0.87)和未来科学职业兴趣检验(r = 0.99)收集数据,并采用协方差分析、估计边际均值(EMM)和scheff事后分析对7个假设进行0.05显著性水平的检验。研究结果表明,治疗和FCIS对学生的基础科学成绩有显著的影响,而性别对学生的基础科学成绩没有显著的影响。因此,建议在认识到学生FCIS的基础科学实践教学中采用SL和ELGM实验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信