Assessing Content Validity of Enterprise Architecture Adoption Questionnaire (EAAQ) Among Content Experts

N. Ahmad, S. M. Drus, H. Kasim, M. Othman
{"title":"Assessing Content Validity of Enterprise Architecture Adoption Questionnaire (EAAQ) Among Content Experts","authors":"N. Ahmad, S. M. Drus, H. Kasim, M. Othman","doi":"10.1109/ISCAIE.2019.8743918","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Content validity is the process to validate the measurement items from the perspective of experts. Notably, there are lack of validated items measuring the perception of intention to adopt Enterprise Architecture (EA) in the public sector organisations. This study intended to develop and assess the content validity of measurement items for EAAQ as a survey instrument to public sector organisations. Twelve academic and industrial content experts have assessed the validity of 14 identified constructs and 52 measurement items. This study was conducted through two cycles of content validation process. The written EAAQ was distributed via email or by a meeting session with the content experts for assessing the measurement items. The analysis of content experts’ consensus was examined using a quantitative approach called Content Validity Ratio (CVR) and Content Validity Index (CVI). Of the 52 items, 50 were accepted, as the CVR’s critical value that must be abided by 0.75 (N = 8) and two items were rejected. Then, the accepted items were computed to a final form using CVI. The acceptable CVI value for the final EAAQ is 0.94. Therefore, a new 50-item EAAQ was developed based on validated content and face values by the experts for public sector organisations. In future, the measurement items should be reassessed on its psychometric properties for the EAAQ reliability and internal consistency. This instrument would be useful for measuring the perception of EA adoption in organisations.","PeriodicalId":369098,"journal":{"name":"2019 IEEE 9th Symposium on Computer Applications & Industrial Electronics (ISCAIE)","volume":"86 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 IEEE 9th Symposium on Computer Applications & Industrial Electronics (ISCAIE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISCAIE.2019.8743918","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

Content validity is the process to validate the measurement items from the perspective of experts. Notably, there are lack of validated items measuring the perception of intention to adopt Enterprise Architecture (EA) in the public sector organisations. This study intended to develop and assess the content validity of measurement items for EAAQ as a survey instrument to public sector organisations. Twelve academic and industrial content experts have assessed the validity of 14 identified constructs and 52 measurement items. This study was conducted through two cycles of content validation process. The written EAAQ was distributed via email or by a meeting session with the content experts for assessing the measurement items. The analysis of content experts’ consensus was examined using a quantitative approach called Content Validity Ratio (CVR) and Content Validity Index (CVI). Of the 52 items, 50 were accepted, as the CVR’s critical value that must be abided by 0.75 (N = 8) and two items were rejected. Then, the accepted items were computed to a final form using CVI. The acceptable CVI value for the final EAAQ is 0.94. Therefore, a new 50-item EAAQ was developed based on validated content and face values by the experts for public sector organisations. In future, the measurement items should be reassessed on its psychometric properties for the EAAQ reliability and internal consistency. This instrument would be useful for measuring the perception of EA adoption in organisations.
在内容专家中评估企业架构采用问卷(EAAQ)的内容有效性
内容效度是从专家的角度对测量项目进行验证的过程。值得注意的是,在公共部门组织中缺乏有效的项目来衡量采用企业架构(Enterprise Architecture, EA)的意图。本研究旨在开发和评估EAAQ测量项目的内容效度,作为公共部门组织的调查工具。12位学术和工业内容专家评估了14个确定的构念和52个测量项目的效度。本研究通过两个周期的内容验证过程进行。书面的EAAQ通过电子邮件或与内容专家开会的方式分发,以评估测量项目。内容专家的共识分析使用定量方法称为内容效度比(CVR)和内容效度指数(CVI)进行检验。在52个项目中,50个项目被接受,作为CVR必须遵守的临界值0.75 (N = 8), 2个项目被拒绝。然后,使用CVI将接受的项目计算为最终形式。最终EAAQ的可接受CVI值为0.94。因此,一个新的50项EAAQ是由公共部门组织的专家根据经过验证的内容和表面价值开发的。未来,测量项目应重新评估其心理测量特性,以提高EAAQ的信度和内部一致性。这个工具对于度量组织对EA采用的看法是有用的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信