Comparative Analysis of Results of Modern Classification Algorithms Usage for Determining the Type of Physical Activity Based on Integrated Sensors Data

A. V. Agranovskiĭ, A. P. Silukov
{"title":"Comparative Analysis of Results of Modern Classification Algorithms Usage for Determining the Type of Physical Activity Based on Integrated Sensors Data","authors":"A. V. Agranovskiĭ, A. P. Silukov","doi":"10.1109/WECONF51603.2021.9470661","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article considers the usage of various classification algorithms to process data from integrated sensors of a modern smartphone to obtain user's physical activity. To compare classification algorithms, we use modeling based on a dataset from an experiment that has 561 significant characteristics for each type of activity with a total number of records equal to 10299. The analysis of data from integrated sensors is performed by several classification algorithms: decision trees, Random Forest algorithm, logistic regression, support vector machine with a linear function and a kernel function. In addition to pure (without modification) ones, algorithms with preliminary optimization of hyperparameters using random search and cross-validation are used. The evaluation metrics are: Accuracy, Precision, Recall, F-measure, Mean Absolute Error and Root Mean Square Error. The estimated metrics and confusion matrices obtained using specially written python scripts using the sklearn library are provided for each algorithm. Analysis of the presented results shows that the best classification results both with preliminary optimization of hyperparameters and cross-validation, and without preliminary tuning, are provided by the use of linear support vector machine algorithm.","PeriodicalId":267775,"journal":{"name":"2021 Wave Electronics and its Application in Information and Telecommunication Systems (WECONF)","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 Wave Electronics and its Application in Information and Telecommunication Systems (WECONF)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/WECONF51603.2021.9470661","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article considers the usage of various classification algorithms to process data from integrated sensors of a modern smartphone to obtain user's physical activity. To compare classification algorithms, we use modeling based on a dataset from an experiment that has 561 significant characteristics for each type of activity with a total number of records equal to 10299. The analysis of data from integrated sensors is performed by several classification algorithms: decision trees, Random Forest algorithm, logistic regression, support vector machine with a linear function and a kernel function. In addition to pure (without modification) ones, algorithms with preliminary optimization of hyperparameters using random search and cross-validation are used. The evaluation metrics are: Accuracy, Precision, Recall, F-measure, Mean Absolute Error and Root Mean Square Error. The estimated metrics and confusion matrices obtained using specially written python scripts using the sklearn library are provided for each algorithm. Analysis of the presented results shows that the best classification results both with preliminary optimization of hyperparameters and cross-validation, and without preliminary tuning, are provided by the use of linear support vector machine algorithm.
基于集成传感器数据确定运动类型的现代分类算法使用结果的比较分析
本文考虑使用各种分类算法来处理来自现代智能手机集成传感器的数据,以获得用户的身体活动。为了比较分类算法,我们使用基于实验数据集的建模,该实验数据集对每种类型的活动具有561个重要特征,记录总数等于10299。对集成传感器数据的分析采用了几种分类算法:决策树、随机森林算法、逻辑回归、线性函数支持向量机和核函数支持向量机。除了纯的(未经修改的)算法外,还使用随机搜索和交叉验证对超参数进行初步优化的算法。评价指标为:正确率、精密度、召回率、f值、平均绝对误差和均方根误差。为每个算法提供了使用使用sklearn库的专门编写的python脚本获得的估计度量和混淆矩阵。分析结果表明,使用线性支持向量机算法进行超参数初步优化和交叉验证,以及不进行初步调优,都能获得最佳的分类结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书