ZOOLOGICAL NAMES AS OBJECT OF LINGUISTIC RESEARCH

Ekaterina M. Dorogaikina, T. G. Ignatieva
{"title":"ZOOLOGICAL NAMES AS OBJECT OF LINGUISTIC RESEARCH","authors":"Ekaterina M. Dorogaikina, T. G. Ignatieva","doi":"10.22250/2410-7190_2019_5_3_53_66","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The history of animal names begins with the early epochs of human evolution, when animalism was one of the basic components of the worldview. Despite a considerable number of works that study zoological vocabulary, the uncertainty of a number of terms and a certain arbitrariness of the use of terms and concepts associated with animal names is still present in onomastics, e.g. \"zoonym\" and \"zoomorphism\" refer to such concepts. The purpose of the article is to clarify the terminological meaning of these concepts, to generalize and systematize the basic research on the theory of zoonymic nominations. The research methodology was formed on the basis of theoretical positions in the field of onomastics and the theory of nominations in modern linguistics. As a result of the theoretical analysis the following findings were made. First, the terms \"zoonym\" and \"zoomorphism\" are not synonymous. \"Zoonym\" is a more general term than \"zoomorphism\". Zoomorphism represents zoological names of anthropological nature, attributing the traits associated with the image of an animal to a human. Zoonyms do not have such attributes. \"Zoonim\" is proposed to be the general term. Another finding was that the functioning of zoonyms and zoomorphisms in the literary text is influenced by the genre of the text, which is expressed in the genre determinism of the lexical composition of zoonyms nominating animals.","PeriodicalId":415120,"journal":{"name":"Theoretical and Applied Linguistics","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Theoretical and Applied Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22250/2410-7190_2019_5_3_53_66","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The history of animal names begins with the early epochs of human evolution, when animalism was one of the basic components of the worldview. Despite a considerable number of works that study zoological vocabulary, the uncertainty of a number of terms and a certain arbitrariness of the use of terms and concepts associated with animal names is still present in onomastics, e.g. "zoonym" and "zoomorphism" refer to such concepts. The purpose of the article is to clarify the terminological meaning of these concepts, to generalize and systematize the basic research on the theory of zoonymic nominations. The research methodology was formed on the basis of theoretical positions in the field of onomastics and the theory of nominations in modern linguistics. As a result of the theoretical analysis the following findings were made. First, the terms "zoonym" and "zoomorphism" are not synonymous. "Zoonym" is a more general term than "zoomorphism". Zoomorphism represents zoological names of anthropological nature, attributing the traits associated with the image of an animal to a human. Zoonyms do not have such attributes. "Zoonim" is proposed to be the general term. Another finding was that the functioning of zoonyms and zoomorphisms in the literary text is influenced by the genre of the text, which is expressed in the genre determinism of the lexical composition of zoonyms nominating animals.
作为语言学研究对象的动物名称
动物名称的历史始于人类进化的早期,当时动物主义是世界观的基本组成部分之一。尽管有相当多的研究动物学词汇的著作,但在动物名称相关的术语和概念的使用中,一些术语的不确定性和一定的随意性仍然存在。“zoonym”和“zoomorphism”就是指这样的概念。本文旨在厘清这些概念的术语含义,对人畜共名理论的基础研究进行概括和梳理。其研究方法是在拟声学的理论立场和现代语言学的命名理论的基础上形成的。通过理论分析,得出以下结论:首先,“zoonym”和“zoomorphism”并不是同义词。“Zoonym”是一个比“zoomorphism”更通用的术语。动物形态学代表了人类学性质的动物学名称,将与动物形象相关的特征归因于人类。动物名没有这样的属性。建议将“Zoonim”作为总称。另一个发现是,动物名词和兽同形词在文学文本中的功能受到文本类型的影响,这表现在动物名词的词汇构成的类型决定论中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信