Comparison of Global Observations and Trends of Total Precipitable Water Derived from Microwave Radiometers and COSMIC Radio Occultation from 2006 to 2013
{"title":"Comparison of Global Observations and Trends of Total Precipitable Water Derived from Microwave Radiometers and COSMIC Radio Occultation from 2006 to 2013","authors":"S. Ho, Liang Peng, C. Mears, R. Anthes","doi":"10.5194/ACP-18-259-2018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. We compare atmospheric total precipitable water (TPW) derived from\nthe\nSSM/I (Special Sensor Microwave Imager) and SSMIS (Special Sensor Microwave\nImager/Sounder) radiometers and WindSat to collocated TPW estimates derived\nfrom COSMIC (Constellation System for Meteorology, Ionosphere, and Climate)\nradio occultation (RO) under clear and cloudy conditions over the oceans from\nJune 2006 to December 2013. Results show that the mean microwave (MW)\nradiometer – COSMIC TPW differences range from 0.06 to 0.18 mm for clear\nskies, from\n0.79 to 0.96 mm for cloudy skies, from 0.46 to 0.49 mm for cloudy but non-precipitating\nconditions, and from 1.64 to 1.88 mm for precipitating conditions. Because RO\nmeasurements are not significantly affected by clouds and precipitation, the\nbiases mainly result from MW retrieval uncertainties under cloudy and\nprecipitating conditions. All COSMIC and MW radiometers detect a positive TPW\ntrend over these 8 years. The trend using all COSMIC observations\ncollocated with MW pixels for this data set is 1.79 mm decade −1 , with a 95 %\nconfidence interval of (0.96, 2.63), which is in close agreement with the\ntrend estimated by the collocated MW observations (1.78 mm decade −1 with a\n95 % confidence interval of 0.94, 2.62). The sample of MW and RO pairs used\nin this study is highly biased toward middle latitudes (40–60 ∘ N and 40–65 ∘ S), and thus these trends are\nnot representative of global average trends. However, they are representative\nof the latitudes of extratropical storm tracks and the trend values are\napproximately 4 to 6 times the global average trends, which are\napproximately 0.3 mm decade −1 . In addition, the close agreement of these two\ntrends from independent observations, which represent an increase in TPW in\nour data set of about 6.9 %, are a strong indication of the positive water\nvapor–temperature feedback on a warming planet in regions where precipitation\nfrom extratropical storms is already large.","PeriodicalId":283309,"journal":{"name":"Earth and its Atmosphere","volume":"43 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"31","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Earth and its Atmosphere","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5194/ACP-18-259-2018","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 31
Abstract
Abstract. We compare atmospheric total precipitable water (TPW) derived from
the
SSM/I (Special Sensor Microwave Imager) and SSMIS (Special Sensor Microwave
Imager/Sounder) radiometers and WindSat to collocated TPW estimates derived
from COSMIC (Constellation System for Meteorology, Ionosphere, and Climate)
radio occultation (RO) under clear and cloudy conditions over the oceans from
June 2006 to December 2013. Results show that the mean microwave (MW)
radiometer – COSMIC TPW differences range from 0.06 to 0.18 mm for clear
skies, from
0.79 to 0.96 mm for cloudy skies, from 0.46 to 0.49 mm for cloudy but non-precipitating
conditions, and from 1.64 to 1.88 mm for precipitating conditions. Because RO
measurements are not significantly affected by clouds and precipitation, the
biases mainly result from MW retrieval uncertainties under cloudy and
precipitating conditions. All COSMIC and MW radiometers detect a positive TPW
trend over these 8 years. The trend using all COSMIC observations
collocated with MW pixels for this data set is 1.79 mm decade −1 , with a 95 %
confidence interval of (0.96, 2.63), which is in close agreement with the
trend estimated by the collocated MW observations (1.78 mm decade −1 with a
95 % confidence interval of 0.94, 2.62). The sample of MW and RO pairs used
in this study is highly biased toward middle latitudes (40–60 ∘ N and 40–65 ∘ S), and thus these trends are
not representative of global average trends. However, they are representative
of the latitudes of extratropical storm tracks and the trend values are
approximately 4 to 6 times the global average trends, which are
approximately 0.3 mm decade −1 . In addition, the close agreement of these two
trends from independent observations, which represent an increase in TPW in
our data set of about 6.9 %, are a strong indication of the positive water
vapor–temperature feedback on a warming planet in regions where precipitation
from extratropical storms is already large.