Comparison of Global Observations and Trends of Total Precipitable Water Derived from Microwave Radiometers and COSMIC Radio Occultation from 2006 to 2013

S. Ho, Liang Peng, C. Mears, R. Anthes
{"title":"Comparison of Global Observations and Trends of Total Precipitable Water Derived from Microwave Radiometers and COSMIC Radio Occultation from 2006 to 2013","authors":"S. Ho, Liang Peng, C. Mears, R. Anthes","doi":"10.5194/ACP-18-259-2018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. We compare atmospheric total precipitable water (TPW) derived from\nthe\nSSM/I (Special Sensor Microwave Imager) and SSMIS (Special Sensor Microwave\nImager/Sounder) radiometers and WindSat to collocated TPW estimates derived\nfrom COSMIC (Constellation System for Meteorology, Ionosphere, and Climate)\nradio occultation (RO) under clear and cloudy conditions over the oceans from\nJune 2006 to December 2013. Results show that the mean microwave (MW)\nradiometer – COSMIC TPW differences range from 0.06 to 0.18 mm for clear\nskies, from\n0.79 to 0.96 mm for cloudy skies, from 0.46 to 0.49 mm for cloudy but non-precipitating\nconditions, and from 1.64 to 1.88 mm for precipitating conditions. Because RO\nmeasurements are not significantly affected by clouds and precipitation, the\nbiases mainly result from MW retrieval uncertainties under cloudy and\nprecipitating conditions. All COSMIC and MW radiometers detect a positive TPW\ntrend over these 8 years. The trend using all COSMIC observations\ncollocated with MW pixels for this data set is 1.79 mm decade −1 , with a 95 %\nconfidence interval of (0.96, 2.63), which is in close agreement with the\ntrend estimated by the collocated MW observations (1.78 mm decade −1 with a\n95 % confidence interval of 0.94, 2.62). The sample of MW and RO pairs used\nin this study is highly biased toward middle latitudes (40–60 ∘  N and 40–65 ∘  S), and thus these trends are\nnot representative of global average trends. However, they are representative\nof the latitudes of extratropical storm tracks and the trend values are\napproximately 4 to 6 times the global average trends, which are\napproximately 0.3 mm decade −1 . In addition, the close agreement of these two\ntrends from independent observations, which represent an increase in TPW in\nour data set of about 6.9 %, are a strong indication of the positive water\nvapor–temperature feedback on a warming planet in regions where precipitation\nfrom extratropical storms is already large.","PeriodicalId":283309,"journal":{"name":"Earth and its Atmosphere","volume":"43 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"31","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Earth and its Atmosphere","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5194/ACP-18-259-2018","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 31

Abstract

Abstract. We compare atmospheric total precipitable water (TPW) derived from the SSM/I (Special Sensor Microwave Imager) and SSMIS (Special Sensor Microwave Imager/Sounder) radiometers and WindSat to collocated TPW estimates derived from COSMIC (Constellation System for Meteorology, Ionosphere, and Climate) radio occultation (RO) under clear and cloudy conditions over the oceans from June 2006 to December 2013. Results show that the mean microwave (MW) radiometer – COSMIC TPW differences range from 0.06 to 0.18 mm for clear skies, from 0.79 to 0.96 mm for cloudy skies, from 0.46 to 0.49 mm for cloudy but non-precipitating conditions, and from 1.64 to 1.88 mm for precipitating conditions. Because RO measurements are not significantly affected by clouds and precipitation, the biases mainly result from MW retrieval uncertainties under cloudy and precipitating conditions. All COSMIC and MW radiometers detect a positive TPW trend over these 8 years. The trend using all COSMIC observations collocated with MW pixels for this data set is 1.79 mm decade −1 , with a 95 % confidence interval of (0.96, 2.63), which is in close agreement with the trend estimated by the collocated MW observations (1.78 mm decade −1 with a 95 % confidence interval of 0.94, 2.62). The sample of MW and RO pairs used in this study is highly biased toward middle latitudes (40–60 ∘  N and 40–65 ∘  S), and thus these trends are not representative of global average trends. However, they are representative of the latitudes of extratropical storm tracks and the trend values are approximately 4 to 6 times the global average trends, which are approximately 0.3 mm decade −1 . In addition, the close agreement of these two trends from independent observations, which represent an increase in TPW in our data set of about 6.9 %, are a strong indication of the positive water vapor–temperature feedback on a warming planet in regions where precipitation from extratropical storms is already large.
2006 - 2013年微波辐射计和COSMIC掩星全球观测和总可降水量趋势的比较
摘要我们比较了2006年6月至2013年12月在海洋晴朗和多云条件下,由特殊传感器微波成像仪(essm /I)和特殊传感器微波成像仪/探测仪(SSMIS)辐射计和WindSat获得的大气总可降水量(TPW)与由COSMIC(气象、电离层和气候星座系统)无线电掩星(RO)获得的大气总可降水量(TPW)。结果表明:晴空条件下,COSMIC微波辐射计的平均TPW差值为0.06 ~ 0.18 mm,多云条件下为0.79 ~ 0.96 mm,多云无降水条件下为0.46 ~ 0.49 mm,降水条件下为1.64 ~ 1.88 mm。由于ro测量值不受云和降水的显著影响,因此偏差主要是由多云和降水条件下的MW检索不确定性造成的。在这8年中,所有COSMIC和MW辐射计都探测到一个积极的tpwp趋势。该数据集使用与MW像素配置的所有COSMIC观测值的趋势为1.79 mm decade - 1, 95%置信区间为(0.96,2.63),这与配置的MW观测值估计的趋势(1.78 mm decade - 1, 95%置信区间为0.94,2.62)非常吻合。本研究中使用的MW和RO对样本高度偏向中纬度地区(40-60°N和40-65°S),因此这些趋势不能代表全球平均趋势。然而,它们代表了温带风暴路径的纬度,趋势值大约是全球平均趋势的4到6倍,全球平均趋势约为0.3毫米十年- 1。此外,这两种趋势的密切一致表明,在我们的数据集中,TPW增加了约6.9%,这有力地表明,在温带风暴降水已经很大的地区,地球变暖的水汽-温度正反馈。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信