Participation in OER Creation: A Trajectory of Values

Erin Meger, M. Schwartz, Wendy Freeman
{"title":"Participation in OER Creation: A Trajectory of Values","authors":"Erin Meger, M. Schwartz, Wendy Freeman","doi":"10.18357/otessaj.2021.1.2.13","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper provides an analysis of interviews with seven faculty members who engaged in creating Open textbooks funded by government grants at a university in Canada in 2018. Using four values—access and equity, community and connection, agency and ownership, and risk and responsibility—identified by Sinkinson (2018), McAndrew (2018), and Keyek-Fransen (2018), we traced the ways in which university faculty members’ understanding of Open changed through the process of Open Educational Resource creation. As a teaching support-focused unit, we explore ways to provide our faculty and instructors with meaningful opportunities to develop their Open pedagogy. These findings reconceive the way that Open Educational Practice can be promoted at our University and others. Instead of focusing solely on OER creation, our faculty started engaging in thinking through the different conceptions of Open educational practice and identifying which concepts resonated with them. By reframing the ways in which faculty thought about Open Educational Practices, we have been better able to address the ways in which we support them.","PeriodicalId":242908,"journal":{"name":"The Open/Technology in Education, Society, and Scholarship Association Journal","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Open/Technology in Education, Society, and Scholarship Association Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18357/otessaj.2021.1.2.13","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper provides an analysis of interviews with seven faculty members who engaged in creating Open textbooks funded by government grants at a university in Canada in 2018. Using four values—access and equity, community and connection, agency and ownership, and risk and responsibility—identified by Sinkinson (2018), McAndrew (2018), and Keyek-Fransen (2018), we traced the ways in which university faculty members’ understanding of Open changed through the process of Open Educational Resource creation. As a teaching support-focused unit, we explore ways to provide our faculty and instructors with meaningful opportunities to develop their Open pedagogy. These findings reconceive the way that Open Educational Practice can be promoted at our University and others. Instead of focusing solely on OER creation, our faculty started engaging in thinking through the different conceptions of Open educational practice and identifying which concepts resonated with them. By reframing the ways in which faculty thought about Open Educational Practices, we have been better able to address the ways in which we support them.
参与OER创造:价值轨迹
本文对加拿大一所大学2018年参与政府资助的开放教科书创作的7名教师的访谈进行了分析。利用Sinkinson(2018)、McAndrew(2018)和Keyek-Fransen(2018)确定的四种价值观——获取和公平、社区和联系、代理和所有权、风险和责任,我们追踪了大学教师对开放的理解在开放教育资源创造过程中的变化方式。作为一个以教学支持为重点的单位,我们探索如何为我们的教师和讲师提供有意义的机会来发展他们的开放教学法。这些发现重新设想了开放教育实践可以在我们大学和其他大学推广的方式。我们的教师不再仅仅关注开放式教育资源的创造,而是开始思考开放教育实践的不同概念,并确定哪些概念与他们产生共鸣。通过重构教师思考开放教育实践的方式,我们能够更好地解决我们支持他们的方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信