Hayat Touati, Mohamed Guezgouz, Benkhaled Hadj, Djamel Mokrani
{"title":"Using Factor Analysis as a Tool for Measuring the Quality of Life of University Students","authors":"Hayat Touati, Mohamed Guezgouz, Benkhaled Hadj, Djamel Mokrani","doi":"10.2478/atd-2022-0025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Introduction: The aim of this research is to design a tool (a scale) for measuring the quality of life of university students and to copy down its validity, use and reliability on six-dimension academic achievement: it touches family life quality, social life quality, personal happiness, life satisfaction and mental health. Methods: 963 male and female students from the Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Psychology, for the academic year 2018/2019 were exposed to the application of the model (factor analysis) and the reliability coefficient was reached by using Roland and Kettmann equation (.773) and Spearman-Brown (.776) and Cronbach’s Alpha (.629). Results: The feedbacks show that this tool for measuring ‘Quality of University Student Life’ is characterized and described as a good degree of stability. Discussion: When using “factor analysis” tool, we conclude that the exit dimensions focus on two basic axes: the first axis related to public health, quality of education, Family life, life satisfaction, and mental health. The second one consists of the quality of social life and personal happiness. Since these results have given a good degree to some extent, we were commended for working in favour of this tool (a scale) to judge the life quality of university students majoring in psychology faculty at the university. Limitations: The research and the questionnaire of the tool were applied to a group of psychology students at the national level which includes 963 male and female students with a percentage of 23.98%. The questions of this tool were tested on a sample of 963 students at the national level who were randomly chosen from various disciplines of master’s degree in psychology. Research was conducted during the academic year 2018/2019. Conclusions: The targeted instrument designed in this research which is “the factor analysis” has achieves a good validity and stability and has driven to two basic scales.","PeriodicalId":113905,"journal":{"name":"Acta Educationis Generalis","volume":"69 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Educationis Generalis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/atd-2022-0025","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
Abstract Introduction: The aim of this research is to design a tool (a scale) for measuring the quality of life of university students and to copy down its validity, use and reliability on six-dimension academic achievement: it touches family life quality, social life quality, personal happiness, life satisfaction and mental health. Methods: 963 male and female students from the Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Psychology, for the academic year 2018/2019 were exposed to the application of the model (factor analysis) and the reliability coefficient was reached by using Roland and Kettmann equation (.773) and Spearman-Brown (.776) and Cronbach’s Alpha (.629). Results: The feedbacks show that this tool for measuring ‘Quality of University Student Life’ is characterized and described as a good degree of stability. Discussion: When using “factor analysis” tool, we conclude that the exit dimensions focus on two basic axes: the first axis related to public health, quality of education, Family life, life satisfaction, and mental health. The second one consists of the quality of social life and personal happiness. Since these results have given a good degree to some extent, we were commended for working in favour of this tool (a scale) to judge the life quality of university students majoring in psychology faculty at the university. Limitations: The research and the questionnaire of the tool were applied to a group of psychology students at the national level which includes 963 male and female students with a percentage of 23.98%. The questions of this tool were tested on a sample of 963 students at the national level who were randomly chosen from various disciplines of master’s degree in psychology. Research was conducted during the academic year 2018/2019. Conclusions: The targeted instrument designed in this research which is “the factor analysis” has achieves a good validity and stability and has driven to two basic scales.
摘要:本研究的目的是设计一种衡量大学生生活质量的工具(量表),并将其效度、使用度和信度复制到六个维度的学业成就上:涉及家庭生活质量、社会生活质量、个人幸福感、生活满意度和心理健康。方法:对2018/2019学年心理学系社会科学学院963名男女学生进行因子分析,采用Roland and Kettmann方程(.773)、Spearman-Brown方程(.776)和Cronbach 's Alpha(.629)求得信度系数。结果:反馈表明,这一衡量“大学生生活质量”的工具具有良好的稳定性。讨论:当使用“因素分析”工具时,我们得出结论,退出维度集中在两个基本轴上:第一个轴与公共卫生、教育质量、家庭生活、生活满意度和心理健康有关。二是社会生活质量和个人幸福感。由于这些结果在一定程度上给出了良好的程度,因此我们赞成使用这个工具(一个量表)来判断大学心理学专业的大学生的生活质量,这受到了赞扬。局限性:本研究及工具问卷均应用于全国心理学专业学生,共963名男女学生,占23.98%。该工具的问题在963名全国水平的学生中进行了测试,这些学生是从心理学硕士学位的各个学科中随机抽取的。研究在2018/2019学年进行。结论:本研究设计的目标工具“因子分析”取得了良好的效度和稳定性,并驱动到两个基本量表。