Silencing Indigenous Knowledge Systems: Analysis of Canadian Educational, Legal and Administrative Practice

L. Clarysse, Shannon A. Moore
{"title":"Silencing Indigenous Knowledge Systems: Analysis of Canadian Educational, Legal and Administrative Practice","authors":"L. Clarysse, Shannon A. Moore","doi":"10.11114/IJLPA.V2I1.4157","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As a result of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada (or TRCC, 2015a, 2015b), calls to action concerning education and law reform have been made. Currently, there is an increase in reconciliation discourse in law, healthcare and education policy, curricula and pedagogy. In Canada, efforts to decolonize institutional structures compel scholars and activists to highlight the imperative of critical analysis of identity and place in answering the calls to action. Although it was developed by the Ministry of Education for the province of Ontario, more than a decade ago, prior to the TRCC, the First Nations, Métis, and Inuit Education Policy Framework continues to inform policy and administrative procedures. Informed by Indigenous knowledge systems embedded in restorative justice and peace-building practices, this paper presents a critical analysis of the First Nations, Métis, and Inuit Education Policy Framework (2007) and finds evidence resembling discursive settler-colonial patterns of Indigenous erasure through the practice of silencing Indigenous participation and voice. Through this critical analysis, several themes emerged including colonialism, survivance, patriarchy, self-identification, notions of education, assessment, and “us versus them” binary narratives. In response, this paper argues for a trans-systemic and transdisciplinary approach to the critical analysis of discursive patterns of silencing and erasure in policy, law reform, and administrative processes. Further, through deepening interpretations and understandings of Indigenous theory and knowledge systems, it may be possible for settler-colonial stakeholders to more acutely discern the impact of settler-colonialism embedded in education, policy, administration, and legal discourses. These findings have implications for educators and administrators as well as administrative, law and policy reform.  ","PeriodicalId":231433,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Law and Public Administration","volume":"73 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Law and Public Administration","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11114/IJLPA.V2I1.4157","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

As a result of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada (or TRCC, 2015a, 2015b), calls to action concerning education and law reform have been made. Currently, there is an increase in reconciliation discourse in law, healthcare and education policy, curricula and pedagogy. In Canada, efforts to decolonize institutional structures compel scholars and activists to highlight the imperative of critical analysis of identity and place in answering the calls to action. Although it was developed by the Ministry of Education for the province of Ontario, more than a decade ago, prior to the TRCC, the First Nations, Métis, and Inuit Education Policy Framework continues to inform policy and administrative procedures. Informed by Indigenous knowledge systems embedded in restorative justice and peace-building practices, this paper presents a critical analysis of the First Nations, Métis, and Inuit Education Policy Framework (2007) and finds evidence resembling discursive settler-colonial patterns of Indigenous erasure through the practice of silencing Indigenous participation and voice. Through this critical analysis, several themes emerged including colonialism, survivance, patriarchy, self-identification, notions of education, assessment, and “us versus them” binary narratives. In response, this paper argues for a trans-systemic and transdisciplinary approach to the critical analysis of discursive patterns of silencing and erasure in policy, law reform, and administrative processes. Further, through deepening interpretations and understandings of Indigenous theory and knowledge systems, it may be possible for settler-colonial stakeholders to more acutely discern the impact of settler-colonialism embedded in education, policy, administration, and legal discourses. These findings have implications for educators and administrators as well as administrative, law and policy reform.  
土著知识体系的沉默:加拿大教育、法律和行政实践分析
由于加拿大真相与和解委员会(TRCC, 2015a, 2015b)的结果,已经提出了有关教育和法律改革的行动呼吁。目前,在法律、保健和教育政策、课程和教学法方面,和解话语有所增加。在加拿大,体制结构非殖民化的努力迫使学者和积极分子在响应行动呼吁时强调对身份和地位进行批判性分析的必要性。虽然它是十多年前,即在TRCC之前由教育部为安大略省制定的,但《第一民族、姆萨姆和因纽特人教育政策框架》继续为政策和行政程序提供信息。根据恢复性司法和和平建设实践中嵌入的土著知识体系,本文对第一民族、msamutis和因纽特人教育政策框架(2007年)进行了批判性分析,并发现了类似定居者-殖民地通过压制土著参与和声音来消除土著的话语模式的证据。通过这种批判性的分析,出现了几个主题,包括殖民主义、生存、父权制、自我认同、教育观念、评估和“我们与他们”的二元叙事。作为回应,本文主张采用跨系统和跨学科的方法,对政策、法律改革和行政过程中沉默和消除的话语模式进行批判性分析。此外,通过加深对土著理论和知识体系的解释和理解,定居者-殖民地利益相关者有可能更敏锐地认识到定居者-殖民主义在教育、政策、行政和法律话语中的影响。这些发现对教育工作者和行政管理人员以及行政、法律和政策改革具有启示意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信