Periferni polemički diskursi povodom Mandićeve knjige Romani krize – kritički paratekst ili „politikantska uzbuna“?

Miranda Levanat-Peričić
{"title":"Periferni polemički diskursi povodom Mandićeve knjige Romani krize – kritički paratekst ili „politikantska uzbuna“?","authors":"Miranda Levanat-Peričić","doi":"10.31261/pn.4028.05","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Publication of a book of literary reviews Romani krize (The Novels of Crisis) by Igor Mandić in Belgrade in 1996, as well as the book promotion in Serbia, have been the subject of sharp attacks on its author in the Croatian media. In this “case,” which Mandić himself called “the chase of the collegial choir of elite commentators” for an “insignificant book of literary reviews,” several peripheral levels that are attempted to impose as dominant or to compete for a more favorable discursive position can be distinguished. First of all, the complex of peripheral is in the very status of literary criticism, the marginal letter, inferior to the prestigious discourses of belletristic and literary theory. However, as Mandić underlined in the foreword to The Novels of Crisis, this “by status wholly devalued writing, no matter how small, could always be used as a ‘symptom’ to raise some sort of ward-heeler’s alarm.” Regardless of the ironic modus of this attitude, the “ward-heeler alarm” that followed completely departed from the subject of this Mandić’s collection, or a decade of Serbian and Croatian literary productions, from the 80’s to the 90’s. Finally, precisely this literary period, which Mandić defined as a decade after the death of J. B. Tito and M. Krleža until the break-up of the SFRY, as the last decade of literary and cultural life in a common state, after its disintegration remained on the historical periphery of newly established national canons. However, the most important peripheral level of the whole of this “case” is concerned with the approach to the body of texts that this book deals with, i.e. a comparative study of Serbian and Croatian literature. At the time it was published in 1996, from peripheral cultural positions the comparative approach to the Croatian and Serbian literature was perceived as a radical political provocation that comes from the common past, in the wake of its renewal. In this work special attention is given to Mandić’s choice of Serbian and Croatian literary titles, hence to the very content of the Novels of Crisis. However, since the cultural context of this book goes beyond the literary criticism of the decade to which it relates, its significance is looked into from the aspect of polemical discourses this book produced, even at the periphery of the Croatian nineties.","PeriodicalId":218068,"journal":{"name":"Periferno u hrvatskoj književnosti i kulturi / Peryferie w chorwackiej literaturze i kulturze","volume":"49 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Periferno u hrvatskoj književnosti i kulturi / Peryferie w chorwackiej literaturze i kulturze","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31261/pn.4028.05","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Publication of a book of literary reviews Romani krize (The Novels of Crisis) by Igor Mandić in Belgrade in 1996, as well as the book promotion in Serbia, have been the subject of sharp attacks on its author in the Croatian media. In this “case,” which Mandić himself called “the chase of the collegial choir of elite commentators” for an “insignificant book of literary reviews,” several peripheral levels that are attempted to impose as dominant or to compete for a more favorable discursive position can be distinguished. First of all, the complex of peripheral is in the very status of literary criticism, the marginal letter, inferior to the prestigious discourses of belletristic and literary theory. However, as Mandić underlined in the foreword to The Novels of Crisis, this “by status wholly devalued writing, no matter how small, could always be used as a ‘symptom’ to raise some sort of ward-heeler’s alarm.” Regardless of the ironic modus of this attitude, the “ward-heeler alarm” that followed completely departed from the subject of this Mandić’s collection, or a decade of Serbian and Croatian literary productions, from the 80’s to the 90’s. Finally, precisely this literary period, which Mandić defined as a decade after the death of J. B. Tito and M. Krleža until the break-up of the SFRY, as the last decade of literary and cultural life in a common state, after its disintegration remained on the historical periphery of newly established national canons. However, the most important peripheral level of the whole of this “case” is concerned with the approach to the body of texts that this book deals with, i.e. a comparative study of Serbian and Croatian literature. At the time it was published in 1996, from peripheral cultural positions the comparative approach to the Croatian and Serbian literature was perceived as a radical political provocation that comes from the common past, in the wake of its renewal. In this work special attention is given to Mandić’s choice of Serbian and Croatian literary titles, hence to the very content of the Novels of Crisis. However, since the cultural context of this book goes beyond the literary criticism of the decade to which it relates, its significance is looked into from the aspect of polemical discourses this book produced, even at the periphery of the Croatian nineties.
1996年,伊戈尔·曼迪奇在贝尔格莱德出版了一本文学评论书《危机小说》(Romani krize),并在塞尔维亚推广这本书,克罗地亚媒体对这本书的作者进行了猛烈的攻击。在这个“案例”中,曼迪奇自己称之为“精英评论家的学院合唱团对一本“无关紧要的文学评论书”的追逐”,可以区分出几个外围层次,这些层次试图将其作为主导或竞争更有利的话语地位。首先,外围情结处于文学批评的地位,处于边缘信的地位,次于文学理论和文学理论的权威话语。然而,正如曼迪奇在《危机小说》的前言中所强调的那样,这种“被完全贬低的写作,无论多么小,总是可以作为一种‘症状’来引起某种ward-heeler的警报。”抛开这种态度的讽刺方式不谈,随后的“沃德-海勒警报”完全偏离了曼迪奇的收藏主题,也偏离了从80年代到90年代的十年塞尔维亚和克罗地亚文学作品。最后,正是这一文学时期,即曼迪奇所定义的J. B.铁托和M. Krleža去世后直到SFRY解体的十年,作为一个共同国家的文学和文化生活的最后十年,在其解体后仍然处于新建立的国家经典的历史边缘。然而,整个“案例”中最重要的外围层面与本书所涉及的文本主体的方法有关,即对塞尔维亚和克罗地亚文学的比较研究。在1996年出版的时候,从边缘文化的角度来看,对克罗地亚和塞尔维亚文学的比较方法被认为是一种激进的政治挑衅,它来自于共同的过去,在它的复兴之后。在这部作品中,我们特别关注了曼迪奇对塞尔维亚和克罗地亚文学标题的选择,从而关注了《危机小说》的内容。然而,由于这本书的文化背景超越了它所涉及的那个年代的文学批评,它的意义是从这本书所产生的争论性话语的角度来研究的,甚至是在克罗地亚90年代的边缘。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信