Melhoramento moral: um avanço ou um retrocesso?

Marcelle Coelho do Rosario
{"title":"Melhoramento moral: um avanço ou um retrocesso?","authors":"Marcelle Coelho do Rosario","doi":"10.5935/2179-9180.20190002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Among the various possibilities of human improvement pursued by emerging technologies (Nanoscience, Biotechnology, Information Technology and Cognitive Sciences NBIC), which beckons for the moral enhancement of man has caused heated debates in diverse follow-ups. The scenario is tempting: being able to raise the levels of emotional empathy, justice, philanthropy and, why not say, humanity through NBIC is magnificent, could be the “salvation of the human race.” Otherwise, any oversight in the stages of viability could mean a new order of oppressors, a new order of the oppressed, which would represent a moral setback. In view of the above, this article intends to (momentarily) parameterize the concepts of human enhancement and moral enhancement, and extract from the transhumanist and bioconservative currents both in their hardest versions arguments related to the way in which the NBIC that aims at moral improvement (or not) to be ministered to society and ask whether, in fact, they would be desired by us.","PeriodicalId":107480,"journal":{"name":"Revista Guairacá de Filosofia","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Guairacá de Filosofia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5935/2179-9180.20190002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Among the various possibilities of human improvement pursued by emerging technologies (Nanoscience, Biotechnology, Information Technology and Cognitive Sciences NBIC), which beckons for the moral enhancement of man has caused heated debates in diverse follow-ups. The scenario is tempting: being able to raise the levels of emotional empathy, justice, philanthropy and, why not say, humanity through NBIC is magnificent, could be the “salvation of the human race.” Otherwise, any oversight in the stages of viability could mean a new order of oppressors, a new order of the oppressed, which would represent a moral setback. In view of the above, this article intends to (momentarily) parameterize the concepts of human enhancement and moral enhancement, and extract from the transhumanist and bioconservative currents both in their hardest versions arguments related to the way in which the NBIC that aims at moral improvement (or not) to be ministered to society and ask whether, in fact, they would be desired by us.
道德进步:进步还是倒退?
在新兴技术(纳米科学、生物技术、信息技术、认知科学)所追求的人类改善的各种可能性中,呼唤人类道德提高的技术在各种后续研究中引起了激烈的争论。这个场景很诱人:能够通过NBIC提高情感共鸣、正义、慈善和人性的水平,为什么不说是伟大的,可能是“人类的救赎”。否则,在生存阶段的任何疏忽都可能意味着压迫者的新秩序,被压迫者的新秩序,这将代表道德上的挫折。鉴于以上所述,本文打算(暂时地)参数化人类增强和道德增强的概念,并从超人类主义和生物保守主义的潮流中提取出与NBIC旨在(或不)为社会服务的方式有关的最艰难的版本,并询问事实上,它们是否会被我们所期望。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信