Quantum complexity theory

Ethan S. Bernstein, U. Vazirani
{"title":"Quantum complexity theory","authors":"Ethan S. Bernstein, U. Vazirani","doi":"10.1145/167088.167097","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper we study quantum computation from a complexity theoretic viewpoint. Our first result is the existence of an efficient universal quantum Turing machine in Deutsch's model of a quantum Turing machine (QTM) [Proc. Roy. Soc. London Ser. A, 400 (1985), pp. 97--117]. This construction is substantially more complicated than the corresponding construction for classical Turing machines (TMs); in fact, even simple primitives such as looping, branching, and composition are not straightforward in the context of quantum Turing machines. We establish how these familiar primitives can be implemented and introduce some new, purely quantum mechanical primitives, such as changing the computational basis and carrying out an arbitrary unitary transformation of polynomially bounded dimension. \nWe also consider the precision to which the transition amplitudes of a quantum Turing machine need to be specified. We prove that $O(\\log T)$ bits of precision suffice to support a $T$ step computation. This justifies the claim that the quantum Turing machine model should be regarded as a discrete model of computation and not an analog one. \nWe give the first formal evidence that quantum Turing machines violate the modern (complexity theoretic) formulation of the Church--Turing thesis. We show the existence of a problem, relative to an oracle, that can be solved in polynomial time on a quantum Turing machine, but requires superpolynomial time on a bounded-error probabilistic Turing machine, and thus not in the class $\\BPP$. The class $\\BQP$ of languages that are efficiently decidable (with small error-probability) on a quantum Turing machine satisfies $\\BPP \\subseteq \\BQP \\subseteq \\Ptime^{\\SP}$. Therefore, there is no possibility of giving a mathematical proof that quantum Turing machines are more powerful than classical probabilistic Turing machines (in the unrelativized setting) unless there is a major breakthrough in complexity theory.","PeriodicalId":280602,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the twenty-fifth annual ACM symposium on Theory of Computing","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1993-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1910","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the twenty-fifth annual ACM symposium on Theory of Computing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/167088.167097","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1910

Abstract

In this paper we study quantum computation from a complexity theoretic viewpoint. Our first result is the existence of an efficient universal quantum Turing machine in Deutsch's model of a quantum Turing machine (QTM) [Proc. Roy. Soc. London Ser. A, 400 (1985), pp. 97--117]. This construction is substantially more complicated than the corresponding construction for classical Turing machines (TMs); in fact, even simple primitives such as looping, branching, and composition are not straightforward in the context of quantum Turing machines. We establish how these familiar primitives can be implemented and introduce some new, purely quantum mechanical primitives, such as changing the computational basis and carrying out an arbitrary unitary transformation of polynomially bounded dimension. We also consider the precision to which the transition amplitudes of a quantum Turing machine need to be specified. We prove that $O(\log T)$ bits of precision suffice to support a $T$ step computation. This justifies the claim that the quantum Turing machine model should be regarded as a discrete model of computation and not an analog one. We give the first formal evidence that quantum Turing machines violate the modern (complexity theoretic) formulation of the Church--Turing thesis. We show the existence of a problem, relative to an oracle, that can be solved in polynomial time on a quantum Turing machine, but requires superpolynomial time on a bounded-error probabilistic Turing machine, and thus not in the class $\BPP$. The class $\BQP$ of languages that are efficiently decidable (with small error-probability) on a quantum Turing machine satisfies $\BPP \subseteq \BQP \subseteq \Ptime^{\SP}$. Therefore, there is no possibility of giving a mathematical proof that quantum Turing machines are more powerful than classical probabilistic Turing machines (in the unrelativized setting) unless there is a major breakthrough in complexity theory.
量子复杂性理论
本文从复杂性理论的角度研究量子计算。我们的第一个结果是在Deutsch的量子图灵机(QTM)模型中存在一个有效的通用量子图灵机[Proc. Roy]。Soc。伦敦爵士。A, 400 (1985), pp. 97—117]。这种构造比经典图灵机(TMs)的相应构造要复杂得多;事实上,即使是简单的原语,如循环、分支和组合,在量子图灵机的上下文中也不是直接的。我们建立了这些熟悉的原语是如何实现的,并引入了一些新的纯量子力学原语,如改变计算基和执行多项式有界维的任意酉变换。我们还考虑了需要指定量子图灵机的跃迁幅度的精度。我们证明$O(\log T)$位的精度足以支持$T$阶跃计算。这证明了量子图灵机模型应该被视为一个离散的计算模型,而不是一个模拟模型。我们给出了第一个正式的证据,证明量子图灵机违反了丘奇-图灵论题的现代(复杂性理论)表述。我们证明了一个问题的存在性,相对于oracle,它可以在量子图灵机上在多项式时间内解决,但在有界错误概率图灵机上需要超多项式时间,因此不在类$\BPP$中。在量子图灵机上有效可判定(具有小错误概率)的语言类$\BQP$满足$\BPP \subseteq \BQP \subseteq \Ptime^{\SP}$。因此,除非复杂性理论有重大突破,否则不可能给出量子图灵机比经典概率图灵机(在非相对论设置下)更强大的数学证明。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信