Assessing bulk energy transport options by taking into account externality constraints

A. Oudalov, M. Reza, L. Lave
{"title":"Assessing bulk energy transport options by taking into account externality constraints","authors":"A. Oudalov, M. Reza, L. Lave","doi":"10.1109/INFRA.2008.5439651","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper presents a method to compare and evaluate alternatives for bulk energy transport to meet evolving needs for electric energy consumption. In particular, it offers insight into the cost and environmental tradeoffs between mine mouth generation with electric transmission technologies and transporting primary energy resources with generation near the customer. A straightforward bulk energy transport model is constructed to address relevant combinations of environmental and other constraints, fuel and capital costs, and advanced technologies. The model uses a life cycle analysis framework and transforms externalities in dollars to compute social as well as private costs. Uncertainties are explored in a sensitivity analysis. The best alternative for bulk energy transport depends on the amount of energy to be transported, the distance, the initial energy source, existing infrastructure, and externalities such as air pollution, safety, noise, and electromagnetic fields.","PeriodicalId":207041,"journal":{"name":"2008 First International Conference on Infrastructure Systems and Services: Building Networks for a Brighter Future (INFRA)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2008 First International Conference on Infrastructure Systems and Services: Building Networks for a Brighter Future (INFRA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/INFRA.2008.5439651","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper presents a method to compare and evaluate alternatives for bulk energy transport to meet evolving needs for electric energy consumption. In particular, it offers insight into the cost and environmental tradeoffs between mine mouth generation with electric transmission technologies and transporting primary energy resources with generation near the customer. A straightforward bulk energy transport model is constructed to address relevant combinations of environmental and other constraints, fuel and capital costs, and advanced technologies. The model uses a life cycle analysis framework and transforms externalities in dollars to compute social as well as private costs. Uncertainties are explored in a sensitivity analysis. The best alternative for bulk energy transport depends on the amount of energy to be transported, the distance, the initial energy source, existing infrastructure, and externalities such as air pollution, safety, noise, and electromagnetic fields.
考虑外部性限制,评估大宗能源运输方案
本文提出了一种方法来比较和评估替代大宗能源运输,以满足不断变化的电力能源消耗需求。特别是,它提供了对矿井口发电与电力传输技术之间的成本和环境权衡的见解,并与客户附近的发电一起运输一次能源。构建了一个简单的大宗能源运输模型,以解决环境和其他限制因素、燃料和资本成本以及先进技术的相关组合问题。该模型使用生命周期分析框架,并将外部性转换为美元,以计算社会和私人成本。在敏感性分析中探讨了不确定性。大宗能源运输的最佳替代方案取决于要运输的能源数量、距离、初始能源来源、现有基础设施以及空气污染、安全、噪音和电磁场等外部性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信