KNOWLEDGE OF CARDIOLOGISTS RELATED TO PROPHYLAXIS OF RHEUMATIC FEVER IN SALVADOR- BA

G. Rocha, V. Ruffini, R. Martins, A. Casé, R. Coutinho, M. Shaw, M. Menezes
{"title":"KNOWLEDGE OF CARDIOLOGISTS RELATED TO PROPHYLAXIS OF RHEUMATIC FEVER IN SALVADOR- BA","authors":"G. Rocha, V. Ruffini, R. Martins, A. Casé, R. Coutinho, M. Shaw, M. Menezes","doi":"10.17267/2317-3386BJMHH.V2I2.407","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Describe and analyze the knowledge of cardiologists on the prophylaxis of Rheumatic Fever (RF). Method: Application of questionnaire to cardiologists and cardiology residents March/2012 to December/2014. Results: The questionnaire was answered by 52 cardiologists 37 (71.8 %) specialists and 15 (28.9 %) cardiology residents. The average time for the formation of the group was 19.28 (±10.16) years, 39 (75 %) work in outpatient SUS, 34 (65%) in private practice. Of these 26 (50%) reported not having followed any cases of acute RF in the last year and 9 (17.3%) said they had not accompanied chronic RF cases last year. Among the 35 respondents (67.3%) report that they attended to most cases in the past and 37 (71.2 %) believe that there has been a decline in the disease. Although the majority, 47 (90.4 %) have knowledge about the last guideline of treatment and diagnosis of RF, the accuracy rate of all therapeutic options used in primary prophylaxis of these patients was 5 (9.6%) and secondary 7 (13.4 %), however 49 (94.2 %) made reference to benzathine penicillin as an option. Conclusions: The current study identified that, although RF is still an important clinical condition in our environment, the physicians interviewed did not show adequate knowledge on the subject, which could be related to poor patient adherence to RF prophylaxis. Greater attention should be devoted to continuing education on RF, which is a disease often neglected.","PeriodicalId":280405,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian Journal of Medicine and Human Health","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brazilian Journal of Medicine and Human Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17267/2317-3386BJMHH.V2I2.407","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objective: Describe and analyze the knowledge of cardiologists on the prophylaxis of Rheumatic Fever (RF). Method: Application of questionnaire to cardiologists and cardiology residents March/2012 to December/2014. Results: The questionnaire was answered by 52 cardiologists 37 (71.8 %) specialists and 15 (28.9 %) cardiology residents. The average time for the formation of the group was 19.28 (±10.16) years, 39 (75 %) work in outpatient SUS, 34 (65%) in private practice. Of these 26 (50%) reported not having followed any cases of acute RF in the last year and 9 (17.3%) said they had not accompanied chronic RF cases last year. Among the 35 respondents (67.3%) report that they attended to most cases in the past and 37 (71.2 %) believe that there has been a decline in the disease. Although the majority, 47 (90.4 %) have knowledge about the last guideline of treatment and diagnosis of RF, the accuracy rate of all therapeutic options used in primary prophylaxis of these patients was 5 (9.6%) and secondary 7 (13.4 %), however 49 (94.2 %) made reference to benzathine penicillin as an option. Conclusions: The current study identified that, although RF is still an important clinical condition in our environment, the physicians interviewed did not show adequate knowledge on the subject, which could be related to poor patient adherence to RF prophylaxis. Greater attention should be devoted to continuing education on RF, which is a disease often neglected.
萨尔瓦多-巴风湿热预防相关心脏病专家的知识
目的:描述和分析心脏科医师对风湿热预防知识的了解情况。方法:2012年3月~ 2014年12月对心内科医师和住院医师进行问卷调查。结果:52名心脏病专家、37名专科医生(71.8%)和15名住院医生(28.9%)回答了问卷。小组组建的平均时间为19.28(±10.16)年,其中39人(75%)在SUS门诊工作,34人(65%)在私人诊所工作。其中26人(50%)报告去年没有随访过任何急性RF病例,9人(17.3%)报告去年没有伴随过慢性RF病例。在35个应答者(67.3%)中,有37个应答者(71.2%)报告说他们过去接触过大多数病例,37个应答者认为这种疾病已经有所下降。虽然大多数47人(90.4%)了解射频治疗和诊断的最新指南,但这些患者在初级预防中使用的所有治疗方案的准确率为5(9.6%)和7(13.4%),但49人(94.2%)参考了苄星青霉素作为一种选择。结论:目前的研究表明,尽管射频在我们的环境中仍然是一个重要的临床疾病,但受访的医生对这一主题的了解并不充分,这可能与患者对射频预防的依从性较差有关。应更加重视RF的继续教育,这是一种经常被忽视的疾病。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信