A Comparative Study of Upper Secondary School Biology Curricula in Two Countries: Finland and Nigeria

E. Nwoke, Anna Uitto, J. Lavonen
{"title":"A Comparative Study of Upper Secondary School Biology Curricula in Two Countries: Finland and Nigeria","authors":"E. Nwoke, Anna Uitto, J. Lavonen","doi":"10.33828/sei.v33.i1.4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Scientific literacy (SL) has been recognized as the main goal of science curricula documents around the world; however, comparative international curriculum research is limited, especially with Western and African countries. To fill this gap, this study aimed to compare the coverage of SL competencies with the components of knowledge, attitudes, and contexts in the upper secondary school biology curricula of Finland and Nigeria. Content analysis was used as a method and a modified version of the SL framework of the Programme for International Student Assessment 2015 (OECD, 2016) was used to analyze the curricula. The results revealed that both curricula contain the main components of SL defined in the framework, scientific knowledge being the most prominent, followed by scientific competencies. Both curricula laid less emphasis on the interpretation competency and attitudes to science component. The curricula differed in the amount of attention paid to the different areas of SL components. The Finnish curriculum focused more on content knowledge, explaining phenomena scientifically and frontiers of science and technology, while in the Nigerian curriculum procedural knowledge, evaluation and design of scientific enquiry and natural resources as context were more emphasized. The results of this study are not only important to the European and African continents but to other parts of the world for the promotion SL in schools, also the findings reinforce the call on curriculum planners and science educators to ensure equal coverage of all the dimensions of SL in the school science curriculum if the next generation of the world is to be scientifically literate.","PeriodicalId":156311,"journal":{"name":"Science Education International","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science Education International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33828/sei.v33.i1.4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Scientific literacy (SL) has been recognized as the main goal of science curricula documents around the world; however, comparative international curriculum research is limited, especially with Western and African countries. To fill this gap, this study aimed to compare the coverage of SL competencies with the components of knowledge, attitudes, and contexts in the upper secondary school biology curricula of Finland and Nigeria. Content analysis was used as a method and a modified version of the SL framework of the Programme for International Student Assessment 2015 (OECD, 2016) was used to analyze the curricula. The results revealed that both curricula contain the main components of SL defined in the framework, scientific knowledge being the most prominent, followed by scientific competencies. Both curricula laid less emphasis on the interpretation competency and attitudes to science component. The curricula differed in the amount of attention paid to the different areas of SL components. The Finnish curriculum focused more on content knowledge, explaining phenomena scientifically and frontiers of science and technology, while in the Nigerian curriculum procedural knowledge, evaluation and design of scientific enquiry and natural resources as context were more emphasized. The results of this study are not only important to the European and African continents but to other parts of the world for the promotion SL in schools, also the findings reinforce the call on curriculum planners and science educators to ensure equal coverage of all the dimensions of SL in the school science curriculum if the next generation of the world is to be scientifically literate.
芬兰和尼日利亚两国高中生物课程比较研究
科学素养已被公认为世界各国科学课程文件的主要目标;然而,国际课程的比较研究是有限的,特别是在西方和非洲国家。为了填补这一空白,本研究旨在比较芬兰和尼日利亚高中生物课程中SL能力的覆盖范围与知识、态度和背景的组成部分。使用内容分析作为一种方法,并使用2015年国际学生评估计划(OECD, 2016) SL框架的修改版本来分析课程。结果表明,两种课程都包含了框架中定义的第二语言的主要组成部分,科学知识是最突出的,其次是科学能力。两种课程都不太强调解释能力和对科学成分的态度。课程对外语成分的不同领域的关注程度不同。芬兰的课程更注重内容知识,科学地解释现象和科学技术的前沿,而尼日利亚的课程更强调程序知识、科学探究的评价和设计以及作为背景的自然资源。这项研究的结果不仅对欧洲和非洲大陆很重要,而且对世界其他地区的学校SL的推广也很重要,研究结果也加强了对课程规划者和科学教育者的呼吁,如果要让世界上的下一代具有科学素养,就必须确保学校科学课程中SL的所有维度都平等覆盖。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信