Need for security and system fairness on the political extremes

Hulda Þórisdóttir, Eva H. Önnudóttir
{"title":"Need for security and system fairness on the political extremes","authors":"Hulda Þórisdóttir, Eva H. Önnudóttir","doi":"10.13177/IRPA.A.2015.11.2.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We advance and empirically test the idea that people on both the far right and far left will be more likely than political moderates to perceive the system as fair, as long as it serves their heightened needs for security. We argue that political extremists may be especially drawn to systems that offer certainty and security. As long as ideological extremists are not alienated from the political system in general, they will, therefore, be especially motivated to see the system as fair, in particular, if extremism is coupled with a heightened need for security. We test this notion using data from Iceland, a country with a wide left–right spread in terms of the political opinions of both parties and people and which was, at the time of the study, still reeling from an economic crisis that strongly affected political trust and threatened people’s sense of security. We analyzed nationally representative data from the European Social Survey in 2012 (N = 752). The results showed a significant three-way interaction between political extremism, the need for security, and political trust in predicting perceived system fairness. The people most likely to perceive the system as fair were political extremists, with relatively high political trust and need for security. The results are discussed in light of context effects and how people on the left and right might have higher needs for security with different threats in mind.","PeriodicalId":294103,"journal":{"name":"Icelandic Review of Politics and Administration","volume":"24 6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Icelandic Review of Politics and Administration","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13177/IRPA.A.2015.11.2.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

We advance and empirically test the idea that people on both the far right and far left will be more likely than political moderates to perceive the system as fair, as long as it serves their heightened needs for security. We argue that political extremists may be especially drawn to systems that offer certainty and security. As long as ideological extremists are not alienated from the political system in general, they will, therefore, be especially motivated to see the system as fair, in particular, if extremism is coupled with a heightened need for security. We test this notion using data from Iceland, a country with a wide left–right spread in terms of the political opinions of both parties and people and which was, at the time of the study, still reeling from an economic crisis that strongly affected political trust and threatened people’s sense of security. We analyzed nationally representative data from the European Social Survey in 2012 (N = 752). The results showed a significant three-way interaction between political extremism, the need for security, and political trust in predicting perceived system fairness. The people most likely to perceive the system as fair were political extremists, with relatively high political trust and need for security. The results are discussed in light of context effects and how people on the left and right might have higher needs for security with different threats in mind.
政治极端需要安全和制度公平
我们提出并通过实证检验了这样一种观点:与政治温和派相比,极右和极左人士都更有可能认为这个制度是公平的,只要它能满足他们对安全的高度需求。我们认为,政治极端分子可能会特别被提供确定性和安全性的制度所吸引。因此,只要意识形态极端分子没有与整个政治制度疏远,他们就会特别有动力认为这个制度是公平的,特别是在极端主义与对安全的高度需求相结合的情况下。我们用冰岛的数据来检验这一观点,冰岛是一个在两党和民众的政治观点上都有很大左右差距的国家,而且在研究的时候,冰岛还在经济危机中蹒跚而行,这场危机严重影响了政治信任,威胁了人们的安全感。我们分析了2012年欧洲社会调查中具有全国代表性的数据(N = 752)。结果显示,政治极端主义、安全需求和政治信任在预测感知系统公平性方面存在显著的三方互动。最有可能认为这个系统是公平的人是政治极端分子,他们对政治的信任度和安全的需求相对较高。根据上下文效应,以及考虑到不同的威胁,左派和右派的人可能对安全有更高的需求,对结果进行了讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信