Four Literacy Practices roled into One: Drama and Early Childhood Literacies

J. Martello
{"title":"Four Literacy Practices roled into One: Drama and Early Childhood Literacies","authors":"J. Martello","doi":"10.1080/17508480209556402","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Drama: Undervalued and Underused The literature on process drama and its use as an effective pedagogical strategy is both extensive and convincing (see, for example, Bolton, Morgan & Saxton, Warren). However, so far, it has not convinced a majority of educators to employ drama in the primary school classroom on a regular basis. This is particularly true of early childhood classrooms, where, it can be argued, it is more appropriate than any other learning and teaching strategy. Although some states in Australia have drama as part of the mandatory curriculum for primary schools, there is evidence to show that it is not generally taught as a subject discipline or used as a learning and teaching strategy. The need for further evidence of drama's value continues to drive committed drama educators to research and explain this much under-rated subject and pedagogy. Dramas value as a learning and teaching strategy is a driving concern of this article. The article characterises drama as a 'productive pedagogy' promoting quality student learning on four essential dimensions. At a time when the spotlight is on the quality of teaching as a determining factor in many children's success in literacy and in schooling in general, the productive pedagogy framework provides critical guidance in how we might achieve excellence in teaching. In relation to specific curriculum content, the paper focuses on the use of drama in early childhood to extend students' literacy learning into four kinds of literacy practices that constitute effective literacy. The work of Luke and Freebody is used here as the basis for discussion of literacy","PeriodicalId":347655,"journal":{"name":"Melbourne Studies in Education","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Melbourne Studies in Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17508480209556402","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Drama: Undervalued and Underused The literature on process drama and its use as an effective pedagogical strategy is both extensive and convincing (see, for example, Bolton, Morgan & Saxton, Warren). However, so far, it has not convinced a majority of educators to employ drama in the primary school classroom on a regular basis. This is particularly true of early childhood classrooms, where, it can be argued, it is more appropriate than any other learning and teaching strategy. Although some states in Australia have drama as part of the mandatory curriculum for primary schools, there is evidence to show that it is not generally taught as a subject discipline or used as a learning and teaching strategy. The need for further evidence of drama's value continues to drive committed drama educators to research and explain this much under-rated subject and pedagogy. Dramas value as a learning and teaching strategy is a driving concern of this article. The article characterises drama as a 'productive pedagogy' promoting quality student learning on four essential dimensions. At a time when the spotlight is on the quality of teaching as a determining factor in many children's success in literacy and in schooling in general, the productive pedagogy framework provides critical guidance in how we might achieve excellence in teaching. In relation to specific curriculum content, the paper focuses on the use of drama in early childhood to extend students' literacy learning into four kinds of literacy practices that constitute effective literacy. The work of Luke and Freebody is used here as the basis for discussion of literacy
四种识字实践合而为一:戏剧和幼儿识字
戏剧:被低估和未充分利用关于过程戏剧及其作为有效教学策略的使用的文献既广泛又令人信服(例如,参见博尔顿,摩根和萨克斯顿,沃伦)。然而,到目前为止,它还没有说服大多数教育工作者在小学课堂上定期使用戏剧。幼儿课堂尤其如此,可以说,这比任何其他学习和教学策略都更合适。尽管澳大利亚的一些州将戏剧作为小学必修课程的一部分,但有证据表明,戏剧通常不是作为一门学科来教授,也不是作为一种学习和教学策略来使用。为了进一步证明戏剧的价值,戏剧教育工作者继续致力于研究和解释这一被低估的学科和教学法。戏剧价值作为一种学习和教学策略是本文的主要关注点。这篇文章将戏剧描述为一种“生产性教学法”,从四个基本方面促进学生的高质量学习。在人们关注教学质量的时候,教学质量是许多儿童在读写能力和学校教育方面取得成功的决定因素,生产教学法框架为我们如何实现卓越教学提供了重要指导。在具体的课程内容方面,本文侧重于在幼儿时期利用戏剧将学生的识字学习扩展为四种构成有效识字的识字实践。路加和自由体的作品在这里被用作讨论读写能力的基础
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信