Dynamic Weight Setting for Personnel Scheduling with Many Objectives

Lucas Kletzander, Nysret Musliu
{"title":"Dynamic Weight Setting for Personnel Scheduling with Many Objectives","authors":"Lucas Kletzander, Nysret Musliu","doi":"10.1609/icaps.v33i1.27231","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"When large sets of constraints and objectives are combined in a practical optimization problem, managing all these potentially conflicting goals can become very difficult and might require to solve an instance multiple times. First, an instance might be infeasible with the current constraints, in which case our system introduces a novel violation score to help identify the constraints that need to be relaxed for the next run. Second, multiple objectives are often combined using a linear combination with hand-crafted weights, which are very difficult to set such that the result matches the expectations regarding the balance between individual objectives. Instead, the user can tell our system particular thresholds for the expected changes in objectives, e.g., to reduce objective 1 by 10 % while not increasing objective 2 by more than 5 %. Dynamic weight setting automatically adapts the weights to reach these thresholds or uses the violation scores to explain reasons for not reaching thresholds. It can not only be used for soft constraints, but also to determine weights when hard constraints are internally represented as soft constraints in meta-heuristics. While the methodology is general, we have implemented it in the context of a personnel scheduling framework of our industry partner and present a detailed evaluation on the domain of Bus Driver Scheduling, where its benefits can be seen in multiple scenarios.","PeriodicalId":239898,"journal":{"name":"International Conference on Automated Planning and Scheduling","volume":"43 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Conference on Automated Planning and Scheduling","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1609/icaps.v33i1.27231","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

When large sets of constraints and objectives are combined in a practical optimization problem, managing all these potentially conflicting goals can become very difficult and might require to solve an instance multiple times. First, an instance might be infeasible with the current constraints, in which case our system introduces a novel violation score to help identify the constraints that need to be relaxed for the next run. Second, multiple objectives are often combined using a linear combination with hand-crafted weights, which are very difficult to set such that the result matches the expectations regarding the balance between individual objectives. Instead, the user can tell our system particular thresholds for the expected changes in objectives, e.g., to reduce objective 1 by 10 % while not increasing objective 2 by more than 5 %. Dynamic weight setting automatically adapts the weights to reach these thresholds or uses the violation scores to explain reasons for not reaching thresholds. It can not only be used for soft constraints, but also to determine weights when hard constraints are internally represented as soft constraints in meta-heuristics. While the methodology is general, we have implemented it in the context of a personnel scheduling framework of our industry partner and present a detailed evaluation on the domain of Bus Driver Scheduling, where its benefits can be seen in multiple scenarios.
多目标人员调度的动态权值设置
当在实际优化问题中结合大量约束和目标时,管理所有这些潜在的冲突目标可能会变得非常困难,并且可能需要多次解决实例。首先,在当前的约束条件下,一个实例可能是不可行的,在这种情况下,我们的系统引入了一个新的违规评分,以帮助识别需要在下次运行时放松的约束条件。其次,多个目标通常使用带有手工制作的权重的线性组合进行组合,这很难使结果与单个目标之间的平衡相匹配。相反,用户可以告诉我们的系统目标预期变化的特定阈值,例如,将目标1减少10%,而不增加目标2超过5%。动态权重设置自动调整权重以达到这些阈值,或者使用违规得分来解释未达到阈值的原因。它不仅可以用于软约束,还可以在硬约束内部表示为软约束时确定权重。虽然该方法是通用的,但我们已经在我们的行业合作伙伴的人员调度框架中实施了它,并对公交司机调度领域进行了详细的评估,在多个场景中可以看到它的好处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信