Design Recommendations for an Adaptive Control System in Agricultural Tractors Based on Expert Knowledge

Marcel Racs, Andreas Kaufmann, Björn Hülle, T. Maier
{"title":"Design Recommendations for an Adaptive Control System in Agricultural Tractors Based on Expert Knowledge","authors":"Marcel Racs, Andreas Kaufmann, Björn Hülle, T. Maier","doi":"10.54941/ahfe1001717","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVE AND SIGNIFICANCEDue to various implements in agricultural technology, the human machine interface (HMI) in tractors is required to cover a wide range of different operating scenarios. According to the current state of the art, the wide range of operating scenarios and changing operating characteristics can be covered only suboptimally by static control elements on the operating armrest. An optimized solution with intuitive operation, high usability and the avoidance of operating errors requires an HMI that can adapt optimally to the changing scenarios. Based on the previous research project aISA, the current project aISA 2.0 (adaptive interface systems in agricultural tractors) focuses on the development of an adaptive operating system in order to provide an optimal interface for the various and changing operating scenarios in tractors. Based on a methodical categorization, a design recommendation for the interface system is developed, among others considering availability, positioning, actuation type and interface technology of the functions examined. For this purpose, expert knowledge and a method for analyzing functionalities and operating is used. The existing method [1] will be further developed and applied to agricultural implements.METHODThe methodological approach can be divided into the following three aspects:1.Expert interviews2.Function and operation analysis, short: FOA3.Development of design recommendations for an optimized adaptive control system in agricultural tractors.In this contribution, the structure and results of the expert interviews are presented in detail. The expert interviews were conducted with developers from six different implement manufacturers regarding eleven different implements for a duration of 1.5 - 2 hours each. The objective was to gather every relevant control function and having each function evaluated by the expert in terms of different aspects. General settings, menu navigation and indicators not related to active controls were excluded. The next step involves analyzing the HMI by applying the established FOA based on the data collected. The individual functions are examined using operating scenarios. This includes comparing the control action performed by the user with the execution of the command by the machine. The analysis results in various compatibilities for each scenario that are necessary for intuitive operation. Based on the compatibilities, the current FOA is expanded including further specifications for the design recommendation of the control functions. This involves using 15 different control types that are available via the software interface (Isobus) commonly used in agricultural engineering. These define the framework for the type of operation on the software side that later can be performed by the adaptive control elements.RESULTSThe requirements for an adaptive operating armrest in agricultural tractors are achieved by the detailed analysis of the operating scenarios, the operating characteristics, the investigation of the compatibilities, and the consideration of the control types. The results lead to specific design recommendations for a conceptual design of the adaptive HMI for the control functions of the investigated implements.","PeriodicalId":409565,"journal":{"name":"Usability and User Experience","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Usability and User Experience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54941/ahfe1001717","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

OBJECTIVE AND SIGNIFICANCEDue to various implements in agricultural technology, the human machine interface (HMI) in tractors is required to cover a wide range of different operating scenarios. According to the current state of the art, the wide range of operating scenarios and changing operating characteristics can be covered only suboptimally by static control elements on the operating armrest. An optimized solution with intuitive operation, high usability and the avoidance of operating errors requires an HMI that can adapt optimally to the changing scenarios. Based on the previous research project aISA, the current project aISA 2.0 (adaptive interface systems in agricultural tractors) focuses on the development of an adaptive operating system in order to provide an optimal interface for the various and changing operating scenarios in tractors. Based on a methodical categorization, a design recommendation for the interface system is developed, among others considering availability, positioning, actuation type and interface technology of the functions examined. For this purpose, expert knowledge and a method for analyzing functionalities and operating is used. The existing method [1] will be further developed and applied to agricultural implements.METHODThe methodological approach can be divided into the following three aspects:1.Expert interviews2.Function and operation analysis, short: FOA3.Development of design recommendations for an optimized adaptive control system in agricultural tractors.In this contribution, the structure and results of the expert interviews are presented in detail. The expert interviews were conducted with developers from six different implement manufacturers regarding eleven different implements for a duration of 1.5 - 2 hours each. The objective was to gather every relevant control function and having each function evaluated by the expert in terms of different aspects. General settings, menu navigation and indicators not related to active controls were excluded. The next step involves analyzing the HMI by applying the established FOA based on the data collected. The individual functions are examined using operating scenarios. This includes comparing the control action performed by the user with the execution of the command by the machine. The analysis results in various compatibilities for each scenario that are necessary for intuitive operation. Based on the compatibilities, the current FOA is expanded including further specifications for the design recommendation of the control functions. This involves using 15 different control types that are available via the software interface (Isobus) commonly used in agricultural engineering. These define the framework for the type of operation on the software side that later can be performed by the adaptive control elements.RESULTSThe requirements for an adaptive operating armrest in agricultural tractors are achieved by the detailed analysis of the operating scenarios, the operating characteristics, the investigation of the compatibilities, and the consideration of the control types. The results lead to specific design recommendations for a conceptual design of the adaptive HMI for the control functions of the investigated implements.
基于专家知识的农用拖拉机自适应控制系统设计建议
目的与意义由于农业技术中的各种工具,拖拉机的人机界面(HMI)需要涵盖广泛的不同操作场景。根据目前的技术水平,操作扶手上的静态控制元件只能次优地覆盖大范围的操作场景和变化的操作特性。一个操作直观、可用性高、避免操作错误的优化解决方案,需要一个能够最优地适应不断变化的场景的HMI。当前项目aISA 2.0(农业拖拉机自适应接口系统)在前期研究项目aISA的基础上,重点开发自适应操作系统,为拖拉机各种多变的操作场景提供最优接口。在系统分类的基础上,提出了接口系统的设计建议,其中考虑了所检查功能的可用性、定位、驱动类型和接口技术。为此,使用了专家知识和分析功能和操作的方法。现有方法[1]将进一步发展并应用于农具。方法方法方法可分为以下三个方面:interviews2专家。功能和操作分析,简称:FOA3。农用拖拉机优化自适应控制系统设计建议的发展。在这篇文章中,详细介绍了专家访谈的结构和结果。专家访谈是与来自6个不同工具制造商的开发人员进行的,涉及11种不同的工具,每种工具持续1.5 - 2小时。目标是收集每个相关的控制功能,并由专家从不同方面对每个功能进行评估。一般设置、菜单导航和与主动控件无关的指标被排除在外。下一步涉及到根据收集到的数据应用已建立的FOA来分析HMI。使用操作场景检查各个功能。这包括将用户执行的控制动作与机器执行的命令进行比较。分析结果为每个场景提供了直观操作所必需的各种兼容性。基于兼容性,对当前FOA进行了扩展,包括控制功能设计建议的进一步规范。这涉及到使用15种不同的控制类型,这些类型可通过通常用于农业工程的软件接口(Isobus)获得。这些定义了软件端操作类型的框架,这些操作以后可以由自适应控制元素执行。结果通过对农用拖拉机操作场景的详细分析、操作特点、兼容性调查和控制类型的考虑,达到了对农用拖拉机自适应操作扶手的要求。研究结果为所研究的工具的控制功能的自适应人机界面的概念设计提供了具体的设计建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信