Primary and secondary effects of social origins on educational attainment: New findings for England.

E. Bukodi, J. Goldthorpe, Yizhang Zhao
{"title":"Primary and secondary effects of social origins on educational attainment: New findings for England.","authors":"E. Bukodi, J. Goldthorpe, Yizhang Zhao","doi":"10.31235/osf.io/chvz7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We aim to bring together two current strands of research into inequalities in individuals' educational attainment that are associated with their social origins: that concerned with the \"primary\" and \"secondary\" effects of social origins in creating inequalities, and that concerned with the relation between these inequalities and different components of social origins, taken to represent different forms of parental resources. Our main findings are the following. The secondary effects of social origins-their effects via the educational choices that young people make given their prior academic performance-are clearly operative across five key educational transitions within the English educational system. More specifically, we estimate that 35% of the total effect of social origins is secondary in the earliest transition that we consider, and from 15% to 20% in the subsequent four. Furthermore, mediation analyses reveal that secondary effects are most strongly associated with parental education and then, to a lesser degree with parental status, while little association exists with parental class and none at all with parental income. Primary effects are also at all transitions most strongly associated with parental education and status but in this case both parental class and parental income do retain some importance. We suggest an explanation for our empirical findings as resulting largely from the concern of highly educated, professional parents, and their children to avoid the occurrence of downward intergenerational mobility, especially in terms of education and status.","PeriodicalId":365401,"journal":{"name":"The British journal of sociology","volume":"41 5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The British journal of sociology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/chvz7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

We aim to bring together two current strands of research into inequalities in individuals' educational attainment that are associated with their social origins: that concerned with the "primary" and "secondary" effects of social origins in creating inequalities, and that concerned with the relation between these inequalities and different components of social origins, taken to represent different forms of parental resources. Our main findings are the following. The secondary effects of social origins-their effects via the educational choices that young people make given their prior academic performance-are clearly operative across five key educational transitions within the English educational system. More specifically, we estimate that 35% of the total effect of social origins is secondary in the earliest transition that we consider, and from 15% to 20% in the subsequent four. Furthermore, mediation analyses reveal that secondary effects are most strongly associated with parental education and then, to a lesser degree with parental status, while little association exists with parental class and none at all with parental income. Primary effects are also at all transitions most strongly associated with parental education and status but in this case both parental class and parental income do retain some importance. We suggest an explanation for our empirical findings as resulting largely from the concern of highly educated, professional parents, and their children to avoid the occurrence of downward intergenerational mobility, especially in terms of education and status.
社会出身对教育成就的主要和次要影响:英国的新发现。
我们的目标是将目前关于个人受教育程度不平等的两种研究结合起来,这些研究与他们的社会起源有关:一种是关于社会起源在造成不平等方面的“主要”和“次要”影响,另一种是关于这些不平等与社会起源的不同组成部分之间的关系,这些组成部分代表了不同形式的父母资源。我们的主要发现如下。社会出身的次要影响——通过年轻人根据他们之前的学习成绩所做的教育选择而产生的影响——在英国教育体系的五个关键教育转变中明显起作用。更具体地说,我们估计,在我们考虑的最早的转变中,社会起源的总影响中有35%是次要的,在随后的四个转变中,这一比例从15%上升到20%。此外,中介分析显示,二次效应与父母教育程度的关系最为密切,其次与父母地位的关系次之,而与父母阶层的关系则微乎其微,与父母收入的关系则完全没有。在所有的转变中,主要影响也与父母的教育程度和地位密切相关,但在这种情况下,父母的阶级和收入确实也有一定的重要性。我们建议对我们的实证研究结果进行解释,认为这主要是由于受过高等教育的专业父母和他们的孩子担心代际向下流动的发生,特别是在教育和地位方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信