Evaluating the performance of machine learning algorithms for network intrusion detection systems in the internet of things infrastructure

Y. Banadaki
{"title":"Evaluating the performance of machine learning algorithms for network intrusion detection systems in the internet of things infrastructure","authors":"Y. Banadaki","doi":"10.14419/JACST.V9I1.30992","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As numerous Internet-of-Things (IoT) devices are deploying on a daily basis, network intrusion detection systems (NIDS) are among the most critical tools to ensure the protection and security of networks against malicious cyberattacks. This paper employs four machine learning algorithms: XGBoost, random forest, decision tree, and gradient boosting, and evaluates their performance in NIDS, considering the accuracy, precision, recall, and F-score. The comparative analysis conducted using the CICIDS2017 dataset reveals that the XGBoost performs better than the other algorithms reaching the predicted accuracy of 99.6% in detecting cyberattacks. XGBoost-based attack detectors also have the largest weighted metrics of F1-score, precision, and recall. The paper also studies the effect of class imbalance and the size of the normal and attack classes. The small numbers of some attacks in training datasets mislead the classifier to bias towards the majority classes resulting in a bottleneck to improving macro recall and macro F1 score. The results assist the network engineers in choosing the most effective machine learning-based NIDS to ensure network security for today’s growing IoT network traffic.","PeriodicalId":445404,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Technology","volume":"89 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14419/JACST.V9I1.30992","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As numerous Internet-of-Things (IoT) devices are deploying on a daily basis, network intrusion detection systems (NIDS) are among the most critical tools to ensure the protection and security of networks against malicious cyberattacks. This paper employs four machine learning algorithms: XGBoost, random forest, decision tree, and gradient boosting, and evaluates their performance in NIDS, considering the accuracy, precision, recall, and F-score. The comparative analysis conducted using the CICIDS2017 dataset reveals that the XGBoost performs better than the other algorithms reaching the predicted accuracy of 99.6% in detecting cyberattacks. XGBoost-based attack detectors also have the largest weighted metrics of F1-score, precision, and recall. The paper also studies the effect of class imbalance and the size of the normal and attack classes. The small numbers of some attacks in training datasets mislead the classifier to bias towards the majority classes resulting in a bottleneck to improving macro recall and macro F1 score. The results assist the network engineers in choosing the most effective machine learning-based NIDS to ensure network security for today’s growing IoT network traffic.
评估物联网基础设施中网络入侵检测系统的机器学习算法的性能
随着每天部署的物联网(IoT)设备越来越多,网络入侵检测系统(NIDS)是确保网络免受恶意网络攻击的保护和安全的最关键工具之一。本文采用了XGBoost、随机森林、决策树和梯度增强四种机器学习算法,并从正确率、精密度、召回率和F-score等方面评估了它们在NIDS中的性能。使用CICIDS2017数据集进行的对比分析表明,XGBoost在检测网络攻击方面的表现优于其他算法,预测准确率达到99.6%。基于xgboost的攻击检测器还具有最大的f1得分、精度和召回率加权指标。本文还研究了班级不平衡的影响以及正常班级和攻击班级的规模。训练数据集中某些攻击的数量较少,会误导分类器偏向多数类,从而导致提高宏观召回率和宏观F1分数的瓶颈。研究结果有助于网络工程师选择最有效的基于机器学习的NIDS,以确保当今不断增长的物联网网络流量的网络安全。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信