PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP KONSUMEN TRANSPORTASI BERBASIS ONLINE YANG MENGGUNAKAN DRIVER CADANGAN

S. Halim, Siti Nurbaiti
{"title":"PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP KONSUMEN TRANSPORTASI BERBASIS ONLINE YANG MENGGUNAKAN DRIVER CADANGAN","authors":"S. Halim, Siti Nurbaiti","doi":"10.24912/adigama.v1i2.2753","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Logistic or transportation, including online transportation is an essential aspect in every day’s life. Technology advancement has promoted the introduction of online transportation in Indonesia. However, there is no clear integrated regulation of online transportation including reserve driver. This research also to look at how online transportation company will be responsible on the consumer who used the service of ‘backup’ driver; and what is the legal protection of the consumer in order to protect consumer who had used the service of reserve driver. The method used in this research is normative research specifications, using secondary data and primary data as supporting data with the law approach. The result shows that online transportation customers with reserve driver cannot hold accountability to the online transportation company based on Article 19 of the UUPK and Article 192 UULLAJ, because the business owners are not public transport companies but are the application-based companies. In addition, online transportation also does not provide legal protection to passengers, including of reserve driver, consumers cannot sue the company under UUPK or UULLAJ, but consumers can sue the company under Article 1365 of the Civil Code. Hence, author suggests the government should issue a government-controlled regulation regarding online transportation including reserve driver which could result in the provisions usage of the carrier responsibility in accordance to the UULLAJ by online transportation. Furthermore, online transportation company must provide legal protection to ensure legal certainty for consumers by releasing regulations and sanctions for drivers who lend their account to other driver.","PeriodicalId":206816,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Hukum Adigama","volume":"60 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Hukum Adigama","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24912/adigama.v1i2.2753","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Logistic or transportation, including online transportation is an essential aspect in every day’s life. Technology advancement has promoted the introduction of online transportation in Indonesia. However, there is no clear integrated regulation of online transportation including reserve driver. This research also to look at how online transportation company will be responsible on the consumer who used the service of ‘backup’ driver; and what is the legal protection of the consumer in order to protect consumer who had used the service of reserve driver. The method used in this research is normative research specifications, using secondary data and primary data as supporting data with the law approach. The result shows that online transportation customers with reserve driver cannot hold accountability to the online transportation company based on Article 19 of the UUPK and Article 192 UULLAJ, because the business owners are not public transport companies but are the application-based companies. In addition, online transportation also does not provide legal protection to passengers, including of reserve driver, consumers cannot sue the company under UUPK or UULLAJ, but consumers can sue the company under Article 1365 of the Civil Code. Hence, author suggests the government should issue a government-controlled regulation regarding online transportation including reserve driver which could result in the provisions usage of the carrier responsibility in accordance to the UULLAJ by online transportation. Furthermore, online transportation company must provide legal protection to ensure legal certainty for consumers by releasing regulations and sanctions for drivers who lend their account to other driver.
使用备用司机的在线交通消费者的法律保护
物流或运输,包括在线运输是日常生活中必不可少的一个方面。技术进步促进了印尼在线交通的引入。然而,对于包括后备司机在内的网络交通,目前还没有明确的综合监管。这项研究还着眼于在线交通公司将如何对使用“备用”司机服务的消费者负责;为了保护曾经使用过后备司机服务的消费者,消费者的法律保护是什么?本研究采用的方法是规范的研究规范,以二次数据和一手数据作为支撑数据,采用规律的方法。结果表明,基于UUPK第19条和UULLAJ第192条,拥有预约司机的网约车客户不能对网约车公司进行问责,因为企业主不是公共交通公司,而是基于应用的公司。此外,在线交通也没有为乘客提供法律保护,包括备用司机,消费者不能根据UUPK或UULLAJ起诉公司,但消费者可以根据民法典第1365条起诉公司。因此,作者建议政府应该针对包括后备司机在内的网络运输出台政府控制的法规,从而使网络运输按照UULLAJ的规定使用承运人责任。此外,网约车公司必须提供法律保护,通过发布对将自己的账户借给其他司机的规定和制裁,确保消费者的法律确定性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信