Poll Illiteracy: How the Public Misunderstands Polls

A. Graefe
{"title":"Poll Illiteracy: How the Public Misunderstands Polls","authors":"A. Graefe","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3834394","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The century-long tradition of reporting poll results as vote shares does not provide direct answers to the very questions voters are most interested in (e.g., who will govern). The present study provides experimental evidence showing that voters are largely unable to derive such information from polls themselves. When estimating the likelihood of two electoral outcomes, participants failed to realize that small changes in poll numbers can have large electoral consequences. The results suggest that it may be time to revisit how to communicate poll results to the public.","PeriodicalId":372343,"journal":{"name":"DecisionSciRN: Decision-Making & Forecasting (Topic)","volume":"39 4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"DecisionSciRN: Decision-Making & Forecasting (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3834394","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

The century-long tradition of reporting poll results as vote shares does not provide direct answers to the very questions voters are most interested in (e.g., who will govern). The present study provides experimental evidence showing that voters are largely unable to derive such information from polls themselves. When estimating the likelihood of two electoral outcomes, participants failed to realize that small changes in poll numbers can have large electoral consequences. The results suggest that it may be time to revisit how to communicate poll results to the public.
民调文盲:公众如何误解民调
一个世纪以来,将投票结果作为选票份额进行报告的传统并不能直接回答选民最感兴趣的问题(例如,谁将执政)。本研究提供的实验证据表明,选民在很大程度上无法从民意调查中获得这些信息。在估计两种选举结果的可能性时,参与者没有意识到民意调查数字的微小变化可能会对选举产生重大影响。结果表明,现在可能是重新考虑如何向公众传达民意调查结果的时候了。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信