Investigating the robustness of aisles in a non-traditional unit-load warehouse design: Leverage

Ömer Öztürkoğlu
{"title":"Investigating the robustness of aisles in a non-traditional unit-load warehouse design: Leverage","authors":"Ömer Öztürkoğlu","doi":"10.1109/CEC.2015.7257160","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recently, [9] proposed a non-traditional aisle design for unit-load warehouse for one, centrally located pickup and deposit (P&D) point both on the lower and upper sides of warehouse. We call this design Leverage. However, the number of P&D points is limited to one in design Leverage. Hence, in this research, we investigate the changes in improvement of Leverage as the number of P&D points increases by searching optimal designs by using [9]'s approach. We then compare Leverage with the improved designs to investigate its robustness in terms of changes in aisle structure and cost.","PeriodicalId":403666,"journal":{"name":"2015 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC)","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2015 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CEC.2015.7257160","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

Recently, [9] proposed a non-traditional aisle design for unit-load warehouse for one, centrally located pickup and deposit (P&D) point both on the lower and upper sides of warehouse. We call this design Leverage. However, the number of P&D points is limited to one in design Leverage. Hence, in this research, we investigate the changes in improvement of Leverage as the number of P&D points increases by searching optimal designs by using [9]'s approach. We then compare Leverage with the improved designs to investigate its robustness in terms of changes in aisle structure and cost.
调查非传统单位负载仓库设计中通道的稳健性:杠杆
最近,[9]提出了一种非传统的单位负载仓库通道设计,在仓库的上下两侧都有一个集中的取货和存放点。我们称这种设计为杠杆。然而,在设计杠杆中P&D点的数量被限制为1。因此,在本研究中,我们采用[9]的方法,通过搜索最优设计,考察杠杆的改进随P&D点数量增加的变化。然后,我们将杠杆与改进设计进行比较,以调查其在通道结构和成本变化方面的稳健性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信