Combining Capability Indices and Control Charts in the Process and Analytical Method Control Strategy

A. Oliva, M. Llabrés
{"title":"Combining Capability Indices and Control Charts in the Process and Analytical Method Control Strategy","authors":"A. Oliva, M. Llabrés","doi":"10.5772/intechopen.91354","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Different control charts in combination with the process capability indices, Cp, Cpm and Cpk, as part of the control strategy, were evaluated, since both are key elements in determining whether the method or process is reliable for its purpose. All these aspects were analyzed using real data from unitary processes and analytical methods. The traditional x-chart and moving range chart confirmed both analytical method and process are in control and stable and therefore, the process capability indices can be computed. We applied different criteria to establish the specification limits (i.e., analyst/customer requirements) for fixed method or process performance (i.e., process or method requirements). The unitary process does not satisfy the minimum capability requirements for Cp and Cpk indices when the specification limit and control limits are equal in breath. Therefore, the process needs to be revised; especially, a greater control in the process variation is necessary. For the analytical method, the Cpm and Cpk indices were computed. The obtained results were similar in both cases. For example, if the specification limits are set at ±3% of the target value, the method is considered “satisfactory” (1.22","PeriodicalId":194972,"journal":{"name":"Quality Control - Intelligent Manufacturing, Robust Design and Charts","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quality Control - Intelligent Manufacturing, Robust Design and Charts","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.91354","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Different control charts in combination with the process capability indices, Cp, Cpm and Cpk, as part of the control strategy, were evaluated, since both are key elements in determining whether the method or process is reliable for its purpose. All these aspects were analyzed using real data from unitary processes and analytical methods. The traditional x-chart and moving range chart confirmed both analytical method and process are in control and stable and therefore, the process capability indices can be computed. We applied different criteria to establish the specification limits (i.e., analyst/customer requirements) for fixed method or process performance (i.e., process or method requirements). The unitary process does not satisfy the minimum capability requirements for Cp and Cpk indices when the specification limit and control limits are equal in breath. Therefore, the process needs to be revised; especially, a greater control in the process variation is necessary. For the analytical method, the Cpm and Cpk indices were computed. The obtained results were similar in both cases. For example, if the specification limits are set at ±3% of the target value, the method is considered “satisfactory” (1.22
过程能力指标与控制图相结合及分析方法控制策略
作为控制策略的一部分,对不同的控制图与过程能力指数Cp、Cpm和Cpk相结合进行了评估,因为两者都是确定方法或过程是否可靠的关键因素。利用统一过程中的实际数据和分析方法对这些方面进行了分析。传统的x线图和移动距离图证实了分析方法和过程都是可控和稳定的,因此可以计算过程能力指标。我们应用不同的标准来为固定的方法或过程性能(即过程或方法需求)建立规范限制(即,分析师/客户需求)。当规范限值和控制限值相等时,单一工艺不能满足Cp和Cpk指标的最低能力要求。因此,流程需要修改;尤其需要对工艺变化进行更大的控制。对于解析法,计算了Cpm和Cpk指数。在这两种情况下得到的结果是相似的。例如,如果规格限值设定为目标值的±3%,则该方法被认为是“令人满意的”(1.22)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信