Public demand to whitelisting: Another alternative for more secure internet access

E. Sirait
{"title":"Public demand to whitelisting: Another alternative for more secure internet access","authors":"E. Sirait","doi":"10.1109/ICITSI.2016.7858198","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Regulation which requiring all Internet Service Providers to apply negative content filtering based on domain name system in their services, known as blacklisting/blocking method such as Trust positive or Nawala, apparently is still considered less effective to support safe and productive use of the Internet in the community. A more accurate system is needed, and whitelist offered by the government can be an alternative to create more secure internet access. This study has surveyed total 810 internet users in the schools (junior/senior high level) and the boarding schools, targeting students and principals/teachers, and also parents in the household with non-probability sampling techniques. The findings are then discussed in Focus Group Discussion with stakeholders and experts. The results show that the whitelist system receives good response from the respondents. However, the implementation should be based on demand and reserved to segmented users, and not to be applied nationally since it potentially create a lot of noise from the society (procontra). And when it comes to the implementation stage, several challenges need to be considered in order to maximize its purpose. First is related to user information rights in order to remain protected, but not feel restricted. Furthermore, whitelist is also expected to be the answer to overcome largest channel of negative contents distribution based on internet usage profiles, which mostly access internet via mobile phone, and the activity is accessing social media/instant messaging through applications. Some other internet content managements can also be conducted and massively disseminated to complement the content filtering system.","PeriodicalId":172314,"journal":{"name":"2016 International Conference on Information Technology Systems and Innovation (ICITSI)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 International Conference on Information Technology Systems and Innovation (ICITSI)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICITSI.2016.7858198","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Regulation which requiring all Internet Service Providers to apply negative content filtering based on domain name system in their services, known as blacklisting/blocking method such as Trust positive or Nawala, apparently is still considered less effective to support safe and productive use of the Internet in the community. A more accurate system is needed, and whitelist offered by the government can be an alternative to create more secure internet access. This study has surveyed total 810 internet users in the schools (junior/senior high level) and the boarding schools, targeting students and principals/teachers, and also parents in the household with non-probability sampling techniques. The findings are then discussed in Focus Group Discussion with stakeholders and experts. The results show that the whitelist system receives good response from the respondents. However, the implementation should be based on demand and reserved to segmented users, and not to be applied nationally since it potentially create a lot of noise from the society (procontra). And when it comes to the implementation stage, several challenges need to be considered in order to maximize its purpose. First is related to user information rights in order to remain protected, but not feel restricted. Furthermore, whitelist is also expected to be the answer to overcome largest channel of negative contents distribution based on internet usage profiles, which mostly access internet via mobile phone, and the activity is accessing social media/instant messaging through applications. Some other internet content managements can also be conducted and massively disseminated to complement the content filtering system.
公众对白名单的需求:另一种更安全的互联网访问方式
要求所有互联网服务提供商在其服务中采用基于域名系统的负面内容过滤的规定,即所谓的黑名单/封锁方法,如Trust positive或Nawala,显然仍被认为对支持社区安全高效地使用互联网的效果较差。我们需要一个更精确的系统,而政府提供的白名单可以成为创造更安全的互联网接入的一种选择。本研究采用非概率抽样技术,对学校(初中/高中)和寄宿学校共810名互联网用户进行了调查,调查对象包括学生、校长/教师以及家庭中的家长。然后在与利益相关者和专家的焦点小组讨论中讨论调查结果。结果表明,白名单制度得到了受访者的良好响应。但是,实施应该基于需求,并保留给细分用户,而不是在全国范围内应用,因为它可能会产生很多来自社会的噪音(抵触)。在实施阶段,为了最大限度地发挥其作用,需要考虑几个挑战。首先是与用户信息相关的权利要保持保护,而不感到受到限制。此外,白名单也有望成为克服基于互联网使用概况的负面内容传播的最大渠道的答案,主要是通过手机访问互联网,活动是通过应用程序访问社交媒体/即时通讯。其他一些互联网内容管理也可以进行和大规模传播,以补充内容过滤系统。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信