The Legitimacy of Authentic Deeds Read by a Notary via Teleconference

I. M. P. Dharsana, I. Sujana, John MADE FERRARI
{"title":"The Legitimacy of Authentic Deeds Read by a Notary via Teleconference","authors":"I. M. P. Dharsana, I. Sujana, John MADE FERRARI","doi":"10.38142/jpls.v1i1.55","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose:A notary is a public official who must provide services to the community; it is desired to be included in responding to the progress of the times, especially those related to the use of technology through teleconferences. Teleconference is a human association or association that is carried out at a far radius using electronic means.Methodology:The type of research used is normative legal research. The object under study is legal norms, namely related to norms contained in article 16 paragraph (1) letter (m) UUJN-P confirms that a notary must be physically present and sign the deed in the presence of appearers and witnesses. In fact, with technological advances that are very supportive, appearers and witnesses may not be physically present, for example, by holding a teleconference.Findings:The results of this study are that the formality of an authentic deed read by a Notary via teleconference media via video is valid and must have completed parameters related to evidence so that the norm of proof is explained, namely that a proof given at trial is valid as evidence, fulfilling all formal and material aspects.Implication:Regarding the deed that is permitted to use video conferencing media in the form of a general meeting of shareholders (GMS), where the parties are not required to be present at the preparation of the deed, it is enough to be replaced by someone to come to the notary. The signing of the deed in this era of digitalization has yet to have full proof.","PeriodicalId":302506,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Political And Legal Sovereignty","volume":"57 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Political And Legal Sovereignty","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.38142/jpls.v1i1.55","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose:A notary is a public official who must provide services to the community; it is desired to be included in responding to the progress of the times, especially those related to the use of technology through teleconferences. Teleconference is a human association or association that is carried out at a far radius using electronic means.Methodology:The type of research used is normative legal research. The object under study is legal norms, namely related to norms contained in article 16 paragraph (1) letter (m) UUJN-P confirms that a notary must be physically present and sign the deed in the presence of appearers and witnesses. In fact, with technological advances that are very supportive, appearers and witnesses may not be physically present, for example, by holding a teleconference.Findings:The results of this study are that the formality of an authentic deed read by a Notary via teleconference media via video is valid and must have completed parameters related to evidence so that the norm of proof is explained, namely that a proof given at trial is valid as evidence, fulfilling all formal and material aspects.Implication:Regarding the deed that is permitted to use video conferencing media in the form of a general meeting of shareholders (GMS), where the parties are not required to be present at the preparation of the deed, it is enough to be replaced by someone to come to the notary. The signing of the deed in this era of digitalization has yet to have full proof.
公证员通过电话会议宣读真实契约的合法性
目的:公证人是为社会提供服务的公职人员;希望将其纳入对时代进步的反应,特别是那些与通过电话会议使用技术有关的进步。电话会议是利用电子手段在较远的半径范围内进行的人类协会或协会。方法论:使用的研究类型是规范法律研究。研究的对象是法律规范,即与《联合国宪章》第16条第(1)款(m)款所载规范有关的规范确认公证人必须亲自到场并在出庭者和证人在场的情况下签署契约。事实上,随着技术的进步,非常支持,出庭者和证人可能不亲自出席,例如,通过举行电话会议。研究结果:本研究的结果是,公证人通过电话会议媒体通过视频宣读的真实契约的形式是有效的,并且必须具有与证据相关的完整参数,以便解释证明规范,即在审判中提供的证明作为证据是有效的,满足所有形式和物质方面。含义:对于被允许以股东大会(GMS)形式使用视频会议媒体的契据,如果当事人不需要在准备契据时在场,则由人代替到公证处即可。在这个数字化时代,契约的签署还有待充分的证明。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信