My view ... It's that deja vu feeling all over again

A. Bond
{"title":"My view ... It's that deja vu feeling all over again","authors":"A. Bond","doi":"10.1049/CCE:20040402","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"If you thought the arguments over plant floor communications were resolved by the ratification of an international fieldbus standard back in 2000, think again. The emergence of industrial Ethernet as the future physical and transport medium of choice puts the whole issue back in the melting pot. Today there is widespread recognition of Profibus as the clear leader for factory automation applications in Europe, but less widely appreciated is the fact that Interbus runs a surprisingly close second, that DeviceNet rides the manufacturing roost in North America, that Modbus, without the benefit of inclusion in either or any IEC standard, is still the protocol of choice for a large proportion of industrial automation applications or that, in Asia, CC-Link, hardly mentioned in Europe or North America, leads the field, again without benefit of an IEC accolade. Move the spotlight to the process automation sector and, if anything, the picture becomes even more confused. True, there are only two serious contenders: Profibus and Foundation Fieldbus (FF), but they can't even agree between themselves what actually constitutes a process application.","PeriodicalId":401124,"journal":{"name":"Computing & Control Engineering Journal","volume":"52 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computing & Control Engineering Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1049/CCE:20040402","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

If you thought the arguments over plant floor communications were resolved by the ratification of an international fieldbus standard back in 2000, think again. The emergence of industrial Ethernet as the future physical and transport medium of choice puts the whole issue back in the melting pot. Today there is widespread recognition of Profibus as the clear leader for factory automation applications in Europe, but less widely appreciated is the fact that Interbus runs a surprisingly close second, that DeviceNet rides the manufacturing roost in North America, that Modbus, without the benefit of inclusion in either or any IEC standard, is still the protocol of choice for a large proportion of industrial automation applications or that, in Asia, CC-Link, hardly mentioned in Europe or North America, leads the field, again without benefit of an IEC accolade. Move the spotlight to the process automation sector and, if anything, the picture becomes even more confused. True, there are only two serious contenders: Profibus and Foundation Fieldbus (FF), but they can't even agree between themselves what actually constitutes a process application.
我的观点是……那种似曾相识的感觉又回来了
如果你认为2000年国际现场总线标准的批准已经解决了关于工厂车间通信的争论,那么再想想吧。工业以太网作为未来物理和传输媒介的出现,将整个问题重新置于大熔炉中。今天,人们普遍认为Profibus是欧洲工厂自动化应用的明确领导者,但不太受欢迎的是,Interbus出人意料地紧随其后,DeviceNet在北美的制造业中占据主导地位,Modbus没有任何IEC标准的好处。仍然是大部分工业自动化应用的首选协议,或者在亚洲,在欧洲或北美几乎没有提及的CC-Link在该领域处于领先地位,同样没有获得IEC荣誉。将焦点转移到过程自动化领域,如果有的话,情况会变得更加混乱。的确,只有两个强有力的竞争者:Profibus和Foundation Fieldbus (FF),但是它们之间甚至不能就什么构成过程应用程序达成一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信