Questioning ‘what makes us human’: How audiences react to an artificial intelligence–driven show

IF 1.2 Q4 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
Rob Eagle, Rik Lander, Phil D. Hall
{"title":"Questioning ‘what makes us human’: How audiences react to an artificial intelligence–driven show","authors":"Rob Eagle,&nbsp;Rik Lander,&nbsp;Phil D. Hall","doi":"10.1049/ccs2.12018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>I am Echoborg is promoted as ‘a show created afresh each time by the audience in conversation with an artificial intelligence (AI)’. The show demonstrates how AI in a creative and performance context can raise questions about the technology’s ethical use for persuasion and compliance, and how humans can reclaim agency. This audience study focuses on a consecutive three-night run in Bristol, UK in October 2019. The different outcomes of each show illustrate the unpredictability of audience interactions with conversational AI and how the collective dynamic of audience members shapes each performance. This study analyses (1) how I am Echoborg facilitates audience cocreation in a live performance context, (2) the show’s capacity to provoke nuanced understandings of the potential for AI and (3) the ability for intelligent technology to facilitate social interaction and group collaboration. This audience study demonstrates how the show inspires debate beyond binary conclusions (i.e. AI as good or bad) and how audiences can understand potential creative uses of AI, including as a tool for cocreating entertainment <i>with</i> (not just for) them.</p>","PeriodicalId":33652,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive Computation and Systems","volume":"3 2","pages":"91-99"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ietresearch.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1049/ccs2.12018","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognitive Computation and Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1049/ccs2.12018","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

I am Echoborg is promoted as ‘a show created afresh each time by the audience in conversation with an artificial intelligence (AI)’. The show demonstrates how AI in a creative and performance context can raise questions about the technology’s ethical use for persuasion and compliance, and how humans can reclaim agency. This audience study focuses on a consecutive three-night run in Bristol, UK in October 2019. The different outcomes of each show illustrate the unpredictability of audience interactions with conversational AI and how the collective dynamic of audience members shapes each performance. This study analyses (1) how I am Echoborg facilitates audience cocreation in a live performance context, (2) the show’s capacity to provoke nuanced understandings of the potential for AI and (3) the ability for intelligent technology to facilitate social interaction and group collaboration. This audience study demonstrates how the show inspires debate beyond binary conclusions (i.e. AI as good or bad) and how audiences can understand potential creative uses of AI, including as a tool for cocreating entertainment with (not just for) them.

Abstract Image

质疑“是什么让我们成为人类”:观众对人工智能驱动的节目的反应
《我是Echoborg》被宣传为“观众与人工智能(AI)对话,每次都重新创作的节目”。该节目展示了在创意和表演环境下的人工智能如何引发人们对该技术在说服和合规方面的道德使用的质疑,以及人类如何重新获得代理权。这项观众研究的重点是2019年10月在英国布里斯托尔连续三晚的演出。每场演出的不同结果说明了观众与对话式人工智能互动的不可预测性,以及观众的集体动态如何影响每场演出。本研究分析了(1)I am Echoborg如何在现场表演环境中促进观众的共同创造,(2)该节目激发对人工智能潜力的细微理解的能力,以及(3)智能技术促进社会互动和群体协作的能力。这项观众研究展示了该节目如何激发辩论,而不是二元结论(即人工智能是好是坏),以及观众如何理解人工智能的潜在创造性用途,包括作为与他们共同创造娱乐的工具(而不仅仅是为了他们)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cognitive Computation and Systems
Cognitive Computation and Systems Computer Science-Computer Science Applications
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
39
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信