Unrecognized Odd Lot Liquidity Supply: A Hidden Trading Cost for High Priced Stocks

Robert H. Battalio, Shane A. Corwin, R. Jennings
{"title":"Unrecognized Odd Lot Liquidity Supply: A Hidden Trading Cost for High Priced Stocks","authors":"Robert H. Battalio, Shane A. Corwin, R. Jennings","doi":"10.3905/jot.2017.12.1.035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Current National Market System rules do not recognize odd lots in the protected intermarket quote. Thus, liquidity demanders can receive worse prices than they would receive if odd lots were protected. The effect of ignoring odd lots is magnified because off-exchange trades (over one-third of total volume) benchmark executions against the protected quote. The authors identify time intervals with an unprotected odd lot limit order at a price better than the protected quote and examine trades during those intervals for 10 high-priced stocks during one week in 2015. They find over 406,000 intervals, representing 37% of sample stock trading time, in which an odd lot order betters the protected quote. Examining trades within these intervals, they find nearly 55,000 cases in which the trade price is worse than the odd lot price. In total, the price disimprovement in their 10 stocks is $554,675 for the week examined. This previously undocumented trading cost is associated with the corporate decision not to split a stock’s price in a market in which odd lot orders are excluded from the protected quote.","PeriodicalId":254660,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Trading","volume":"93 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Trading","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3905/jot.2017.12.1.035","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Current National Market System rules do not recognize odd lots in the protected intermarket quote. Thus, liquidity demanders can receive worse prices than they would receive if odd lots were protected. The effect of ignoring odd lots is magnified because off-exchange trades (over one-third of total volume) benchmark executions against the protected quote. The authors identify time intervals with an unprotected odd lot limit order at a price better than the protected quote and examine trades during those intervals for 10 high-priced stocks during one week in 2015. They find over 406,000 intervals, representing 37% of sample stock trading time, in which an odd lot order betters the protected quote. Examining trades within these intervals, they find nearly 55,000 cases in which the trade price is worse than the odd lot price. In total, the price disimprovement in their 10 stocks is $554,675 for the week examined. This previously undocumented trading cost is associated with the corporate decision not to split a stock’s price in a market in which odd lot orders are excluded from the protected quote.
未确认的奇数手流动性供给:高价股票的隐性交易成本
现行的国家市场体系规则不承认受保护的市场间报价中的奇数。因此,流动性需求者得到的价格可能比奇数手受到保护时得到的价格更低。忽略奇数手的影响会被放大,因为场外交易(超过总成交量的三分之一)的基准执行与受保护的报价相反。作者确定了未受保护的奇数手限价单的价格优于受保护报价的时间间隔,并研究了2015年一周内10只高价股票在这些间隔内的交易。他们发现超过406,000个间隔,占样本股票交易时间的37%,其中奇数手订单更好地保护报价。在研究这些间隔时间内的交易时,他们发现近55,000个交易价格低于奇数手价格的案例。在调查的一周内,10只股票的价格下跌总额为554,675美元。这一先前未记录的交易成本与公司决定不分割股票价格有关,在这个市场中,奇数手订单被排除在受保护的报价之外。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信