Jonathan Dollimore

C. Marlow
{"title":"Jonathan Dollimore","authors":"C. Marlow","doi":"10.1093/obo/9780190221911-0089","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Jonathan Dollimore (b. 1948) is a writer and academic whose work on early modern literature, desire, and sexuality has been of preeminent importance to English studies for the last forty years. He is best known as the author of Radical Tragedy: Religion, Ideology and Power in the Drama of Shakespeare and His Contemporaries and Sexual Dissidence, as the co-editor of and key contributor to Political Shakespeare, and as the co-originator, with Alan Sinfield, of the critical practice known as cultural materialism. Taken together these interventions revolutionized literary studies by combining a dedication to close textual analysis with an examination of the social and political contexts within which texts are produced and received, a deployment of theory and philosophy and, most controversially, an explicit commitment to progressive political causes. Each of the latter three aspects of this methodology met with considerable objections because they challenged idealist notions of literature as timeless, apolitical, and offering privileged access to an unchanging human nature. Alongside New Historicism, Dollimore and Sinfield’s cultural materialism has been instrumental in introducing an interdisciplinary approach to the study of English literature, so much so that it is now routine for critics and students to consider historical documents, theory, and popular culture alongside canonical literary texts. It is, however, less common to see the political and philosophical elements of Dollimore’s method being pursued systematically, a tendency that he has lamented. Dollimore has always advocated that politics and theory should be backed up with action; to this end, in the same year as the publication of Sexual Dissidence (1991), he co-founded with Sinfield the Centre for the Study of Sexual Dissidence at the University of Sussex, a hub for research and teaching on sexuality and queer studies. The first of its kind in the United Kingdom, the controversial center did significant work to establish the discipline of queer studies/queer theory in the United Kingdom. Dollimore’s work has always been concerned with locating marginal groups within hegemonic cultures, be they gays, lesbians or bisexuals, crossdressers, sex workers, or “perverts,” and with showing how dissident ideas and practices persist alongside dominant ideologies and can even be co-opted by them. He has repeatedly argued against “wishful” uses of theory, and advocates a sustained engagement with intellectual history as a vital corrective to this tendency, an approach that he has practiced throughout his career.","PeriodicalId":119064,"journal":{"name":"Literary and Critical Theory","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Literary and Critical Theory","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/obo/9780190221911-0089","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Jonathan Dollimore (b. 1948) is a writer and academic whose work on early modern literature, desire, and sexuality has been of preeminent importance to English studies for the last forty years. He is best known as the author of Radical Tragedy: Religion, Ideology and Power in the Drama of Shakespeare and His Contemporaries and Sexual Dissidence, as the co-editor of and key contributor to Political Shakespeare, and as the co-originator, with Alan Sinfield, of the critical practice known as cultural materialism. Taken together these interventions revolutionized literary studies by combining a dedication to close textual analysis with an examination of the social and political contexts within which texts are produced and received, a deployment of theory and philosophy and, most controversially, an explicit commitment to progressive political causes. Each of the latter three aspects of this methodology met with considerable objections because they challenged idealist notions of literature as timeless, apolitical, and offering privileged access to an unchanging human nature. Alongside New Historicism, Dollimore and Sinfield’s cultural materialism has been instrumental in introducing an interdisciplinary approach to the study of English literature, so much so that it is now routine for critics and students to consider historical documents, theory, and popular culture alongside canonical literary texts. It is, however, less common to see the political and philosophical elements of Dollimore’s method being pursued systematically, a tendency that he has lamented. Dollimore has always advocated that politics and theory should be backed up with action; to this end, in the same year as the publication of Sexual Dissidence (1991), he co-founded with Sinfield the Centre for the Study of Sexual Dissidence at the University of Sussex, a hub for research and teaching on sexuality and queer studies. The first of its kind in the United Kingdom, the controversial center did significant work to establish the discipline of queer studies/queer theory in the United Kingdom. Dollimore’s work has always been concerned with locating marginal groups within hegemonic cultures, be they gays, lesbians or bisexuals, crossdressers, sex workers, or “perverts,” and with showing how dissident ideas and practices persist alongside dominant ideologies and can even be co-opted by them. He has repeatedly argued against “wishful” uses of theory, and advocates a sustained engagement with intellectual history as a vital corrective to this tendency, an approach that he has practiced throughout his career.
乔纳森Dollimore
乔纳森·多利莫尔(生于1948年)是一位作家和学者,他在早期现代文学、欲望和性方面的工作对过去四十年的英语研究至关重要。他最为人所知的作品是《激进悲剧:莎士比亚及其同时代戏剧中的宗教、意识形态和权力》以及《性异见》,他是《政治莎士比亚》的共同编辑和主要撰稿人,他与艾伦·辛菲尔德共同创立了被称为文化唯物主义的批评实践。这些干预措施结合了对文本的密切分析,对文本产生和接受的社会和政治背景的考察,对理论和哲学的部署,以及最具争议的,对进步政治事业的明确承诺,从而彻底改变了文学研究。这一方法论的后三个方面都遭到了相当大的反对,因为它们挑战了理想主义的文学观念,即文学是永恒的、非政治性的,并提供了通往不变的人性的特权。除了新历史主义,多利莫尔和辛菲尔德的文化唯物主义在引入跨学科方法研究英国文学方面发挥了重要作用,以至于现在评论家和学生将历史文献、理论和流行文化与经典文学文本一起考虑已经成为惯例。然而,系统地研究多里莫尔方法中的政治和哲学元素却不太常见,他曾对这种趋势感到遗憾。多利莫尔一直主张,政治和理论都应该有行动作为后盾;为此,在《性异议》出版的同一年(1991年),他与辛菲尔德在苏塞克斯大学共同创立了性异议研究中心,这是一个关于性和酷儿研究的研究和教学中心。作为英国首个此类中心,这个备受争议的中心为在英国建立酷儿研究/酷儿理论学科做出了重大贡献。Dollimore的作品一直关注于在霸权文化中定位边缘群体,无论他们是同性恋者、双性恋者、异装癖者、性工作者还是“变态”,并展示不同的观点和做法如何与主流意识形态并存,甚至可能被它们所吸收。他一再反对“一厢情愿”地使用理论,并主张持续参与思想史,作为对这种倾向的重要纠正,这是他整个职业生涯中一直在实践的一种方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信