‘The New Global Politics of Religion’: religious harmony, public order, and securitisation in the post-colony

I. Hussin
{"title":"‘The New Global Politics of Religion’: religious harmony, public order, and securitisation in the post-colony","authors":"I. Hussin","doi":"10.17863/CAM.14458","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This article explores key concepts in legal reasoning on the issue of ‘religious harmony’ in Malaysia. It argues that the concept of religious harmony belongs to the realm of public order, and public order is indexed to the legal logic of internal security. In Malaysian legal reasoning, the genealogy of these concepts runs through India and the United Kingdom. Arguments for religious freedom based upon normative commitments to liberal rights do not take into account the institutional and legal logic of internal security, within which toleration has different stakes and meanings. When resources are deployed to support the state governance of religion in service of international security concerns, they further consolidate the confluence of internal security and religious harmony, often at the expense of religious minorities. Through a tracing of the reasoning and references of judges and litigants in a series of judgements on the uses of the word ‘Allah’ by Christians in Malaysia, this article details a post-colonial genealogy of religious harmony through concerns not for toleration or liberty, but for order.","PeriodicalId":252085,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Religious and Political Practice","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Religious and Political Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.14458","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Abstract This article explores key concepts in legal reasoning on the issue of ‘religious harmony’ in Malaysia. It argues that the concept of religious harmony belongs to the realm of public order, and public order is indexed to the legal logic of internal security. In Malaysian legal reasoning, the genealogy of these concepts runs through India and the United Kingdom. Arguments for religious freedom based upon normative commitments to liberal rights do not take into account the institutional and legal logic of internal security, within which toleration has different stakes and meanings. When resources are deployed to support the state governance of religion in service of international security concerns, they further consolidate the confluence of internal security and religious harmony, often at the expense of religious minorities. Through a tracing of the reasoning and references of judges and litigants in a series of judgements on the uses of the word ‘Allah’ by Christians in Malaysia, this article details a post-colonial genealogy of religious harmony through concerns not for toleration or liberty, but for order.
《新的全球宗教政治》:后殖民地时期的宗教和谐、公共秩序和证券化
摘要本文探讨了马来西亚“宗教和谐”问题的法律推理中的关键概念。认为宗教和谐的概念属于公共秩序范畴,公共秩序被索引为内部安全的法律逻辑。在马来西亚的法律推理中,这些概念的谱系贯穿印度和英国。基于对自由权利的规范性承诺的宗教自由论点没有考虑到内部安全的制度和法律逻辑,在这种逻辑中,宽容具有不同的利害关系和意义。当资源被用于支持宗教国家治理以服务于国际安全关切时,它们往往以牺牲少数宗教群体的利益为代价,进一步巩固了内部安全和宗教和谐的融合。本文追溯法官与诉讼当事人对马来西亚基督徒使用“安拉”一词的一系列判决的推理与参考,详述后殖民时期宗教和谐的谱系,其关注的不是宽容或自由,而是秩序。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信