Evaluating knowledge sharing in research: the International Farmers' Conference organized at ICARDA

A. Galiè, Bernhard Hack, Nadia Manning-Thomas, A. Pape-Christiansen, S. Grando, S. Ceccarelli
{"title":"Evaluating knowledge sharing in research: the International Farmers' Conference organized at ICARDA","authors":"A. Galiè, Bernhard Hack, Nadia Manning-Thomas, A. Pape-Christiansen, S. Grando, S. Ceccarelli","doi":"10.1080/19474190903387666","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The objective of this paper is to describe the process and the results of the evaluation of the knowledge sharing (KS) during and after an International Farmers' Conference organized at the International Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas (ICARDA) and involving over 50 farmers and researchers from Algeria, Canada, Egypt, Eritrea, France, Iran, Italy, Jordan, and Syria. Storytelling was chosen by the participants, who set the agenda of the topics to be discussed, as the main framework to exchange farmers' knowledge. The evaluation was based on the anecdotal feedback from the participants gathered during the conference, shortly after the conference, and about a year later and on a questionnaire distributed to 64 non-participating farmers to evaluate the diffusion of the knowledge shared at the conference and its effect on farmers' practices. The narratives that were collected in the evaluation were grouped into categories that illustrate several dimensions of impact such as: acquired knowledge and practices, value added for participants, learning and dissemination of knowledge, network sustainability, change in perception of gender roles, impact on research and effectiveness of KS tools approach. The main results from the survey including participants and non-participants were that 57% of participants (respondents) changed their agricultural practices, all respondents told stories about the conference to others; 71% changed their mind about women's knowledge and role in agriculture, and over three quarters stayed in touch with one or more participants. While Storytelling proved an effective means to facilitate knowledge sharing during and after the Conference, documenting local knowledge remains a challenge as important exchanges might occur outside the formal presentations.","PeriodicalId":169185,"journal":{"name":"Knowledge Management for Development Journal","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Knowledge Management for Development Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19474190903387666","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

The objective of this paper is to describe the process and the results of the evaluation of the knowledge sharing (KS) during and after an International Farmers' Conference organized at the International Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas (ICARDA) and involving over 50 farmers and researchers from Algeria, Canada, Egypt, Eritrea, France, Iran, Italy, Jordan, and Syria. Storytelling was chosen by the participants, who set the agenda of the topics to be discussed, as the main framework to exchange farmers' knowledge. The evaluation was based on the anecdotal feedback from the participants gathered during the conference, shortly after the conference, and about a year later and on a questionnaire distributed to 64 non-participating farmers to evaluate the diffusion of the knowledge shared at the conference and its effect on farmers' practices. The narratives that were collected in the evaluation were grouped into categories that illustrate several dimensions of impact such as: acquired knowledge and practices, value added for participants, learning and dissemination of knowledge, network sustainability, change in perception of gender roles, impact on research and effectiveness of KS tools approach. The main results from the survey including participants and non-participants were that 57% of participants (respondents) changed their agricultural practices, all respondents told stories about the conference to others; 71% changed their mind about women's knowledge and role in agriculture, and over three quarters stayed in touch with one or more participants. While Storytelling proved an effective means to facilitate knowledge sharing during and after the Conference, documenting local knowledge remains a challenge as important exchanges might occur outside the formal presentations.
评估研究中的知识共享:在ICARDA组织的国际农民会议
本文的目的是描述在国际干旱地区农业研究中心(ICARDA)组织的国际农民会议期间和之后对知识共享(KS)进行评估的过程和结果,来自阿尔及利亚、加拿大、埃及、厄立特里亚、法国、伊朗、意大利、约旦和叙利亚的50多名农民和研究人员参加了这次会议。与会者选择讲故事作为交流农民知识的主要框架,并为讨论的主题设定议程。评估基于会议期间、会议结束后不久和大约一年后收集的与会者的轶事反馈,以及向64名未参加会议的农民分发的问卷,以评估会议上分享的知识的传播及其对农民实践的影响。在评估中收集的叙述被分成若干类别,说明了影响的几个方面,如:获得的知识和实践、参与者的附加值、知识的学习和传播、网络的可持续性、对性别角色的看法的变化、对研究的影响和KS工具方法的有效性。包括参与者和非参与者在内的调查的主要结果是,57%的参与者(受访者)改变了他们的农业实践,所有受访者都向他人讲述了有关会议的故事;71%的人改变了对妇女在农业中的知识和作用的看法,超过四分之三的人与一位或多位参与者保持联系。虽然讲故事被证明是在会议期间和之后促进知识分享的有效手段,但记录当地知识仍然是一项挑战,因为重要的交流可能会在正式介绍之外进行。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信